the parameter as the first polyline + the change:
if the first polyline segments was :
pt80{8,9,0}, pt81{10,10,0}, pt82{12,11,0}, pt83{16,11,0}, pt84{19,12,0}...pt89{26,20,0}
then in the new polyline I want it to be (with a change in the x axis of 8 segments)
pt80B{8+8,9,0}, pt81B{10+8,10,0}, pt82B{12+8,11,0}, pt83B{16+8,11,0}, pt84B{19/19+8,12,0}...pt89B{26,20,0}
Thank you for all the help
and you made everything to sound so easy…
nch. {0} {4} {12} {16} etc.
I have looked for ways to solve this automatically but can not seem to find an exact solution if anyone could show me how i can do this automatically it would be great.
Thanks…
he sunPath component works. For example if you want to simulate the hours from 8 to 16 it means you want 8 hours from 8 to 9, from 9 to 10,.... from 15 to 16 (8 hours duration period) so you get from the sunPath component (using default timeStep 1) the 9 sun position/vectors 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (in the image the yellow suns). The things is that if you ask for a smaller timeStep for example 3 = 20 mins then the additional sun position (in the image the orange suns) are added also after the time limit of h16 so probably when you don't want/need. I understand that when you input a time period there is the ambiguity if the hours are the just 9 (the 9 inputs) or the 8 hours included between pairs of hours, but I would make in a way that it is possible to chose if the extra timeStep after the last hour are added or not. Thank you for your comments.
…
GH, create say, a wall, build it out of an array of individual panels layed out in a general grid say 5 x 20 or 100 panels. The panels do not need to touch. Build into your definition, parametrics to modify several aspects of the panels...size, positioning, rotation, corner radius, thickness, etc. Be sure to complicate your parametrics to include modulated variations within each parametric. Now change the parametrics on only 16 of the panels in the array. Place panels with varied parametrics in a specific pattern within the overall array...say a square arrangement. Now change the 16 special panels to another set of panels but change their arrangement to a rectangle pattern. Try several different patterns and/or placement of the cutout pattern.
If you choose to accept this mission, you will likely have to encounter the need to match data precisely and grow to find the 'relative components' quite useful for manipulation for both branches and list items.
Good luck, this message will self destruct in ...........…
nsplit Surface components for making polysurface like surfaces which read as one untrimmed surface, Twisted Box components like Sweep, Deform, Thicken, and Subdivide. Additional features and options added to previous components. General optimizations and fixes all around. Some component rearrangements in the tabs. Some components require at least Rhino 5 SR14. After installing the pufferfish2-0.gha, please close Rhino completely one time to avoid potential assembly reference errors with the "Twisted Box" components.…
hat the math would still apply for 16 sided and 8 sided polygon, but in retrospect, I realize they don't share the same common points.One Observation:The 2 polygons do not quite share the same adjoining boundary points, when the Octagon & Square controls are greater than 0. I'm still trying to find what causes that small discrepancy in your script. (its only noticeable when one zoom in)
cheers!…
the cumulative Sky value.
Ok, this leads me to another question:
The above calculations were done with a grid size of 3, resulting in a single test point on the exploring surface. When I decrease the grid size to 1, resulting in 16 test points and take an average of the values, the result is 464 W/m2 for the same HOY.
-rpict…
d). So far so good. Simulation is fine.
The issue happens with the RadiantTempMap component when i connect the HB_Zones with the output of the setEPZoneCnstr component. Then i get the following message (see point 8 Bad):
1. For one of the meshes in the _viewFactorMesh, the number of faces in the mesh and test points in the _testPtsViewFactor do not match.This can sometimes happen when you have geometry created with one Rhino model tolerance and you generate a mesh off of it with a different tolerance.Try changing your Rhino model tolerance and seeing if it works.
When the connected zones coming from the output of point 3 in file it is OK.
(You need the Custom file from my previous message).
Any ideas?
Thanks,
-A.…
4 cubes gen 2: 8 cubes gen 3:16 cubes
**more generations will eventually go higher.
Q2: Every cubes are taken from the site and it will go in to a total site.
Q3: Yes, the seed func will shuffle the position of these cubes. (under a condition where they do not overlap)
Q4: When the cubes are stacked, i want to keep the site cover (just amount of area) not the surface. And they will be sitting with the cubes.
Q5: I think i should show you the transition from gen 1 to gen n here.
wait a minute
…