{0;1;0}N=6
{0;1;1}N=6
{0;1;2}N=5
{0;2;0}N=7
{0;2;1}N=8
{0;2;2}N=9
Can you shift and wrap any of the paths A B or C?
Say if I wanted to shift and wrap B by 1 to get the following...
{0;0;0}N=7
{0;0;1}N=8
{0;0;2}N=9
{0;1;0}N=3
{0;1;1}N=2
{0;1;2}N=5
{0;2;0}N=6
{0;2;1}N=6
{0;2;2}N=5…
Hi Mohammad, sr.Rotate(Math.Pi/6, D, P) returns a boolean. If it's a True value, then the rotation was succesfull and you can asign the rotated geometry. (30 radians seems to be wrong in your script)
o three parts:
branch 1:
{0;0} N = 3
{0;1} N = 3
branch 2:
{1;0} N = 5
{1;1} N = 5
branch 3:
{2;0} N = 30
{2;1} N = 30
parthmapper won't change the length of branch, explode tree won't give me two branches in one output
…
ap value = True
Shift List = 1 --> (B,C,D,A)
Shift List = 2 --> (C,D,A,B)
You can also use negative values.
Shift List = -1 --> (A,B,C)
Shift List = -2 --> (A,B)
and with Wrap = True
Shift List = -1 --> (D,A,B,C)
Shift List = -2 --> (C,D,A,B)
The most useful Shift List action I use is to either get rid of the first or last item in a list and sometimes both.
Shift list = -1 --> (A,B,C) Shift list = 1 --> (B,C)
In the example posted above you are creating a shift list value equal to its location along the curve. The first section = 0 doesn't get shifted, the second section gets a shift = 1, third = 2, forth = 3 and because the wrap value is set to true the fifth section gets back to 0, sixth = 1 etc etc. creating the twisting effect.
The "one more stupid question" answer is Mass Addition. You will find the component on the Math tab or you can type it into the Keyword search feature (by double clicking the canvas). This component has two outputs a total amount for each list and a partial set of results giving:
List (3,6,9,12)
{0} = 3
{1} = 3+6 = 9
{2} = 3+6+9 = 18
{3} = 3+6+9+12 = 30…
{4}-0;3
{5}-6;7
{6}-5;7
{7}-5;6
Here it can be shown that there are two subgraphs containing 0,1,2,3,4 and 5,6,7. How can I use spiderweb (either using scripting or the components) to give me this result when I have many more vertices??
Thanks,
Sam…
en 3 of them, and one poolyline between two of them.
It would also be very nice if i could control it so that only the successive ones can be connected
so if {0:0:0} has 8 points and {0:0:1} has 8, as do {0:0:5} and {0:0:6} i would like to have this as two polylines, not one continoous that would in this case jump three branches (or curves that are shorter).
Does this make any sense?…
Added by Dusan Bosnjak at 2:08pm on September 28, 2009