ft , 4:3 (to use GH); it could be nice dock icon bars to the left or right working with laptop screen and put it on top working in GH with the 4:3 one.
This feature is cool, but not really usefull.
Best Regards.…
returned to GSA, it is solving. You might have to reset result scales using the GSA button.
Cheers,
Jon
Checking Input Data - this may take some time.
________________________________________
Data checks commenced at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM.
Checking input data for static analysis by GSS.
Shortest element (element 9) is 5 m long.Longest element (element 1) is 6 m long.
Data checks completed at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM. No errors or warnings found.
Analysis commenced at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM.
Analysis by Gss Static analysis
Initialising results modulesSolving for displacementsSolution statisticsSparse Parallel Direct 12 active nodes 14 active elements 2 analysis cases 24 degrees of freedom Minimum degree ordering 90 terms in stiffness matrix Maximum stiffness is 4.804e+009 at node 4 in direction z Minimum stiffness is 3.132e+008 at node 2 in direction yy Condition number of the stiffness matrix is ~ 5328. Maximum relative error in displacements will be 2.4e-10 percent. Factorization in 109 msSolving for element forces and reactionsCalculation completeAnalysis completed with no errors
Analysis completed at 23/08/2017 4:59:18 PM.Analysis time: 0.172 seconds
…
up d'entre vous connaissent pour l'excellent support qu'il a prodigué chez l'éditeur McNeel !
Dates : lundi 9 et mardi 10 décembre 2013
Niveau : Débutant
Pré-requis : non, mais connaissances en langage de programmation ou Grasshopper seront un plus, connaissances en anglais car le cours sera dispensé en langue anglaise.
…
10) you need to make sure GH is reading the culling indicies as a list of 2 values.
In the above example you can set it up without [Flatten] and see what happens to the results... you'll get a list with 18 values. This is because the branch name coming out of the "0" panel is {0} and the branch name coming out of [Subtraction] is {0;0}. GH considers these two separate tree branches thus separately culls each index from the same list and is lumping the results together. 9 values + 9 values = 18 total.
If you right-click on each component there is also a flatten button. I used the [Flatten] component for illustration, but most of the time if you are trying to get rid of tree data it's easier to use the toggle.
When things don't behave as expected it's usually because of embedded tree data structure. Trees can be a bit tricky to get the hang of, but they are useful for many situations. The WIP nature of GH also means frequently double checking everything.…
opper is all these values "recognizing" as similar/same.
I got list of results (n) with following values:
0. -3.2584e-9 1. -4.4992e-9 2. -6.7220e-9 3. -4.5154e-9 4. -4.3325e-9 5. -2.2496e-9 6. -2.2385e-9 7. -6.7525e-9 8. -4.5154e-9
Even though most of these values (maybe all of them) "go" into the second group:
(10^(-9)≤n) and (n>10^(-4))
Grasshopper recognizes all of them as members of the first group:
10^(-4)≥n
I am aware that this kind of very small values are unusual, and maybe Grasshopper is not made for it. But is there any way this can be done?
Take a look:
Thank you.…
i mean, i want a slider that can do 3 sides, 4 sides, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. for the grids because I dont want to use a fixed grid shape such as square grid (4 sides only).