ion, extract structural data, produce 2d drawings, and exchange data with other external software. Nemo also includes free tools to create parametric shapes, such as Naca profiles, hydrofoils, keels, rudders, blade propellers, and sail plans.
Born in 2018 as an academic research project at ENSTA Bretagne, Nemo grew up since, immersed in professional naval architecture practice with L2Onaval.
From 2021, Nemo is now available for purchase with commercial or educational licenses. Following license levels are provided to fit every needs depending of user activity :
Free (Designer)
Level 1 (Section + Hydrostatics + Visualization)
Level 1 + 2 (Section + Hydrostatics + Visualization + Resistance + Structure)
We can also help you make best use of our software, provide project guidance, establish specific workflow and create custom tools.
Requirements
Microsoft Windows 10 or Apple Mac OS 12 Monterey :
McNeel Rhinoceros 7 SR26
(Other Rhinoceros, Windows and Mac OS versions have not been tested but may work)
Additional info
Food4Rhino Download
Discourse Forum
Facebook Page
Linkedin Page
Nemo Website
Credits
Authors : Mathieu VENOT
Contributors : Paul POINET, Laurent DELRIEU
…
ck body with view factor 1 for the exterior. Accordingly, I have set this as the default whenever anyone plugs in the words 'outdoor' for the film coefficient or plugs in a convective film coefficient greater than 10 W/m2K (which is pretty certainly an outdoor condition). You can see the changes here on the github and, if you update your components to sync with the github, they will now work in this manner:
https://github.com/mostaphaRoudsari/honeybee/commit/8804bbdc65bc26a2eef97f5ab358a3191b8b6b12
I'll update the example files with these new components soon.
Furthermore, for the sake of giving complete control over to people using the THERM components, I have added an extra input for a "Custom Radiant Environment" (customRadEnv_) and an extra component by the same name to generate what is needed for this input:
This allows you complete control over the radiation model, view factor, radiant temperature of the environment, and the emissivity of the environment. If you leave the viewFactor input blank, it will assume an autoEnclosure model but, if you specify a viewFactor, it will use the black body model along with that view factor.
Finally, I confirmed that the Constant Heat Flux Boundary Condition is mostly intended to account for solar radiation. So I added an input for this on the boundary condition component.
I'll post back here once I get the chance to update the example files.
Thanks again,
-Chris…
ed to do:
FOA_Bundle_Tower.pdf
The tower height is a variable
The degrees of symmetry in plan is variable from 2 to 10 (2 bundles up to 10 bundles; the actual project has 4 bundles made from 8 individual towers or tubes).
The overall radius or diameter of the circle on which each tower is located is a variable
The tower should match the overall topology of the Bundle Tower: each tube should alternate between touching its neighboring tube on the left and right twice.
The number of floors is a variable
Overall tower height: 500m- Floor to floor height: 4.5m (I recommend that you increase this to 10m while testing)- Each tube's plan roughly has an area of 1000m2
this is what i have got so far:
foa tower.ghx
I just need guidance because i am soo lost. thank you
…
I understand.
I think honeybee and ladybug together are already a great design tool. I didn't realize the whole story with CFD and the various ways you have tried. Have a lot of respect for your project and your colleagues that are working on this, and I hope you guys get enough credit just going for it considering just how ambitious your project is. and open-source equivalence of at least 7 percent equity share too :) as in per owners. if you guys can offer 1 year cliff and 4 year vesting I will consider joining your team. just kidding what your team is doing are beyond me.
After checking simulation CFD 2015, I realized that one big advantage for LB+HB is that well, I didnt see a built in feature of taking account for direct solar gain as part of the simulation.
From the tutorials I have seen, they set the reference temperature to the exterior walls, but there is nothing solar. Here is a rather comprehensive video of how to set up for Simulation CFD . From 10:30 you can see that boundary condition for exterior walls is set with a film coefficient and Reference temperature (around 12:30). At 12:33, there is actually a parameter called radiation right below. I check the parameters for that myself and found that it includes emissivity and reference temperature but not watt hour per square meter like we have it with ladybug.
SO even for a software like simulation CFD, which already seems very sophisticated with the pay-as-you-go cloud parallel simulation option and all, I don't see that it is designed for simulating natural ventilation. Since with SIM CFD it seems that one can be precise about everything including heat plumes from artificial lights in terms of watts so I am guessing that there is a way to model in solar gain as some kind of projected geometry somehow but it is pretty clear that there is EXTRA WORK needed to factor in solar gain there.
I think it would be pretty major if there is a way to model solar radiation and CFD for interior/building envelop together because I have not seen that kind of simulation in the industry.
Thank you for the extra ref cayote and coolvent. I will make check them out along with SAM.
p.s. I reread what I wrote and just wanted clearify I sure didn't refer to any of your work with honeybee or ladybug as "artistic illustration." I meant my pretty arrows :)
…
nd linear/planar tectonics. Within this new field of investigation, the Stuttgart VS will be researching into novel techniques of material mixtures and grading, associative design and double curvature surface generation.
For the second cycle of this exploration we will be based at the Institute for Lightweight Structures and Conceptual Design (ILEK) at the University of Stuttgart. Drawing from the Institute’s long history of experimentation and research on tensile structures instigated by Frei Otto in the 1960s and conducted at present by Werner Sobek, this year we will be focusing on the design and fabrication of materially graded membranes, as well as the application of UHPC and FGC on fabric formworks. The workflow followed will be divided into two stages:
1. Computing Membranes: Computational form finding methods will be taught by professional engineers and architects from ILEK and str.ucture GmbH. The aim will be to utilise the latest software technologies to form find membranes for textile structures, or fabric formworks for complex concrete structures. The results will be evaluated against criteria such as internal air pressure, as well as asymmetric and wind loading. The outcome of this research will inform the material grading procedures (i.e. changing the stiffness, thickness or porosity of the membranes themselves, or the consistency of the concrete poured into the formworks) that will follow in stage two.
2. Fabricated Grading: The digitally computed membranes or formworks will eventually be fabricated physically, utilising the workshop and robotic fabrication facilities at ILEK. The objective will be to rethink conventional research on tensile and concrete structures as isotropic constructs, by customising attributes such as materiality, reinforcement, rigidity, translucency, patterning, and porosity among others. The final, graded prototypes will be made up of mixtures of materials, all accurately engineered to respond to variable environmental, structural and aesthetic criteria, in essence forming multi-material structures that have finally caught up with the latest material developments.
Prominent Features of the workshop/ skills developed:
Teaching team consisting of AA diploma tutors and ILEK and str.ucture GmbH engineers.
Access to the Institute of Lightweight Structures and Conceptual Design (ILEK), the Materials Testing Institute and Concrete Spraying Robotic facilities at the University of Stuttgart, as well as to the office of str.ucture GmbH Structural Design Engineering.
Computational skills tuition on Grasshopper, Rhino Membrane, and Karamba.
Lectures series by leading academics and practitioners in architecture and engineering.
Fabrication of functionally graded membrane and/or concrete structures.
Eligibility
The workshop is open to current architecture and design students, PhD candidates and young professionals. Software Requirements: Rhino (SR7 or later) and Grasshopper.
Fees
The AA Visiting School requires a student fee of £595 and a young professional fee of £895 per participant, which includes a £60 Visiting membership fee.
The deadline for applications is 10 July 2017.
For more information, please visit:
http://www.aaschool.ac.uk/STUDY/VISITING/stuttgart?name=stuttgart
For inquiries, please contact:
mixedmatters@aaschool.ac.uk…
t know if it's common knowledge but in the PD of jewelry, for large scale production, the options are in the dozens if not in the hundreds as in a 3 stone ring (that's my next quest and believe me it is extremely complex and elaborated) which, if you do not draw the line somewhere, you could end up with a definition 10 times as big. I could make a list of the preliminary factors and you could begin to understand at least this one presented here, that looks simple but is not.
If you are a real jeweler and know how many details (interdependent with each others) are needed in order to cover unpredictable factors and lousy tolerances then you'll begin to cover an overextended territory.
For example: if you get to certain stone size then the prongs need to change, but not the bezels, and the bite for setting can go for technical integrity up to a point, because then the look is not appropriate.
If the metal it's platinum you can leave some things as they are but interconnections for metal flow has to change in some area but not if it is in gold.
Some stone count may not fit a particular finger size without going too high or too low, so the bezels need to compensate for this in thickness and visual relationship between them so that when I input a different finger size GH knows what to do based on many more factors etc. etc.
The fact that all geometry is in GH accounts for so many more components.
All this needs to work across the definition, so that if I say this is the stone size I want, all the prongs will need to move apart to have the right bite but with a diameter that is not out of proportions otherwise the stones need automatically to move slightly apart. It's endless.
For this reason we needed to define the market expectations (and have all controls for those ones in GH) and leave the eccentric to a manual manipulation.
Grasshopper it's a hell of a tool to transfer my 40 years of jewelry making (since a little boy :)
but I think I am using maybe 20% of its power.
We used SolidThinking because of the construction tree but there is nothing like Rhino and GH combined!
I wish I was free to share this definition in order to learn from advanced minds here but this time I can't. The next one will be mine (intellectual and technical property) and I can't wait to see how other will take it to the next level.
That's the best way to learn.…
ngle list is identified by a unique path. For example {0}, {0;0;0} or {0;3;0} are all different paths. When data form multiple sources is merged (as in the [V] input of your polyline component), then the various paths are also merged. Thus, the point in the first panel at path {0;0;0} will be put in the same list as the point in the third panel at {0;0;0} as well as the point in the fourth panel at {0;0;0}. Thus, the polyline component will create a polyline through those three points. The second panel contains data with a different path format (only two numbers) and these points will not be merged with anything else because their paths are unique. However a polyline through a single point cannot be made which is probably why the component is orange.
I cannot fix your file because you didn't upload it, but here's some general advice:
Don't put panels in between source and target components. Panels convert the data into text, and this text will then be converted back into whatever type is required on the right. Sometimes this works fine (for example with booleans or integers), sometimes it won't work at all (for example with curves, meshes or breps) and sometimes it will work poorly (for example with points and vectors). The reason it works poorly is because the panel rounds the coordinates to 6 decimal places because this makes for easier viewing. However when points are recreated from the text, the remaining 10 decimals are now lost.It's fine to use panels to inspect data, but inserting them in between source and target components is rarely a good idea.
If you have data that exists in multiple lists but you want to put it all into a single list, you should use a Flatten component.
If you have data in various lists that you want to merge into a single tree (tree = list of lists), but you want to keep all the lists separate, you can use the Entwine component.
You should flatten all your individual point lists, then use Entwine to put them all together and finally plug the result of Entwine into the Polyline V input.…
Added by David Rutten at 3:04pm on September 9, 2016
a modélisation paramétrique avec Grasshopper pour Rhinoceros3D ainsi que démontrer plusieurs façons de l’appliquer à votre travail architectural.
Cette formation est conçue comme une expérience augmentée autour de l’architecture paramétrique et elle comprend aussi :
+ Une introduction au design paramétrique par Francesco Cingolani+ Une étude de cas d’un projet de l’agence de l’agence HDA Hugh Dutton Associés+ Acces gratuit 3 journées à l’espace de coworking SUPERBELLEVILLE
INSTRUCTEURS
FRANCESCO CINGOLANI . designer, enseignant en architecture paramétrique, co-fondateur deSUPERBELLEVILLE coworking, collaborateur de l’agence Hugh Dutton Associés. – voir le profil Linked-in
ŞULE ERTÜRK . Architecte diplômée de l’Université Yildiz Teknik à Istanbul, Master en architecture paramétrique, travaille actuellement aux Ateliers Jean Nouvel dans le département 3D. - voir le profil Linked-in
QUENTIN GAUCHER . Architecte DE-HMONP, diplômé de l’ENSA Paris La Villette, intervenant en architecture paramétrique sur divers projets - voir le profil Linked-in
DATES 25 mars 2013 . Annonce de la formation / Début des inscriptions5 avril 2013 . Fin des inscriptions13 – 14 avril 2013 . Formation
HORAIRES Samedi et Dimanche 13 et 14 avril . 10:00 > 13:00 – 14:00 > 19:00Total : 16 heures
TARIF700 € professionnels400 € étudiants
RÈGLEMENT50% est à régler lors de l’inscription (au plus tard le 5 avril)50% au début de la formation.Les règlements s’effectuent par carte bancaire via Paypal ou par virement bancaire.
NOMBRE DE PARTICIPANTSMinimum pour l’activation de la formation : 5Maximum : 7
CONTACTInscriptions et réglements : fr.cingolani@gmail.com . SUPERBELLEVILLE coworkingInformations : quentin.gaucher@gmail.comimmaginoteca.com/grasshopper
EN BONUSLe café italien et les plats faits maison de Claudia offerts aux participants :)…
n due at the end of march. i am hoping to see if i can do this as a sort of "HIVE MIND" experiment with one or two or more posters to the forum. i have uploaded two files to http://www.formpig.com/nine_bar-FAR and I have the following goals:
1. To "kinematically iterate" various formal building envelopes based upon a 50' x 100' lot that "conform" to the nine bar linkage geometry.
2. This lot would have "setbacks" consisting of two 5' side setbacks, a 10' rear yard setback and a 25' front yard setback. max height on the structure is 32' and the allowable overhangs into the setbacks are 2'. I would like to find a way to use the "nine bar geometry" to construct a series of iterations for "floors", "walls" and "ceilings", which would then be tied to a volumetric (cubic volume), or a total square footage (perhaps based upon two horizontal section cuts) which was based upon a given number that I will provide per local building code.
3. Laid on top of this we would also have "mcmansion ordinance" requirements based upon the pdf enclosed. i expect to have this "tent restriction" data in digital form to upload to ftp shortly.
It would be up to you individually or collectively to determine how best to position this "in the real world" based upon the lot, setbacks, zoning requirements etc. For instance, perhaps the nine bar configuration has its vertices coplanar with the 50' x 100' x 32' envelope restrictions and then the chosen volume is "trimmed' by the setback requirements. Or perhaps the nine-bar configuration is generated completely within the setbacks, or perhaps it is generated 2' outside of the setbacks so as to take advantage of the 2' overhang allowance on the setbacks, etc.
*
Given an opportunity to develop the work in a second phase we would have an opportunity to tie this into various efficiencies such as Bill of Materials (wall floor and ceiling square foot calculations), envelope to volume calculations, solar panel efficiencies (solar orientation and envelope geometry) etc, etc (love to get suggestions for this).
*
I've become /really/ convinced that this would be a /really/ interesting entry based upon my just finishing up Kas Oosterhuis' Towards a New Kind of Building: A Designer's Guide for Non-Standard Architecture". In an ideal world I was hoping that it would be possible to hash this out discussion-wise and then literally passing it around on the list after someone eventually made the first move by tossing out a rough ghx script. My expectation would be to finalize it rapidly in the next two weeks. Something of a contemporary version of a design charette.
However, I realize this may not be workable so if you have experience in this arena and particularly if you think this is a brief that is straighforward enough to be almost literally implemented in Grasshopper, please contact me for any wage and/or contract fee requirements.
I'm getting a bit of a late jump on this but my hope is that with the right participant(s) that I can thrash it together quick enough for the first round.
info@formpig.com…