d' and no extension method 'AnnotativeScalingEnabled' accepting a first argument of type 'Rhino.Geometry.TextEntity' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) (line 94)
Along with some warnings:
1. Warning (CS0618): 'Rhino.Geometry.AnnotationBase.Text' is obsolete: 'Use RichText or PlainText' (line 88)2. Warning (CS0618): 'Rhino.Geometry.AnnotationBase.FontIndex' is obsolete: 'Use Font property instead' (line 92)
3. Warning (CS0618): 'Rhino.RhinoDoc.Fonts' is obsolete: 'Use DimStyles table instead' (line 92)
I've downloaded the latest version of FabTools.
I've completely un-installed and re-installed.
I've Googled everything I can think of to find a solution, but most references are circa 2013 which is probably under Rhino 5. Which works totally fine, BTW.
Does anybody know of a solution?
Thanks,
Michael
…
low for 80 people/minute to pass through? Where along this emergency escape route is the bottleneck? What is the greatest distance in this building to the nearest bathroom? Where do I place my 20 square meters of glass along this wall so that people walking through the hall see that landmark for as long as possible?
These are all questions that could be answered by computation (they can also be answered in other ways of course, building models or simulations, studying existing designs, ...).
If taken to the extreme, every question that would affect the design might be answered using computation at which point you'll have computed your entire design. But I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting such an uncompromising interpretation ought to be the goal of Computationalism.…
tax as rh
if (x<y): print "A-"+xelse: print "B-"+(x-y)
but it thousen't work.
could somebody teach me how to solve this problem, or teach me different way to get a same result.
thank you.…
doing a dummy model with 1 week duration).
However, I think I am running into this issue https://unmethours.com/question/3054/disable-zoneplantsystem-sizing/.
I disable zone sizing from simulation parameters but the OS component still does it, probably due to the reasons mentioned in the post above. Their solution was to delete the design days from the .idf file but I don't want to (yet) go into .idf files. Is there any workaround currently in HB? I can easily be missing something.
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Theodore.…
como 2ECTS - Horario: Jueves y Viernes de 16:00 a 18:00 - Inicio: final de Febrero 2016 -fecha exacta por especificar- - Inscripciones: Envía tus datos (nombre, apellidos, NIF, mail, teléfono) indicando tu preferencia a iamadrid.arquitectura@upm.es
-Aprendizaje del entorno de programación visual para la generación de prototipos dinámicos de proyectos completos. Plataformas de programación basadas en nodos (node-based) para su gestión. -Diseño de algoritmos interrelacionados. Planificar y explicitar procesos. Traducción de procesos a lenguajes de programación. Sintaxis básicas comunes entre todos los lenguajes de programación. -Explorar tanto derivas como objetivos concretos. Programar herramientas de proyecto como parte del proyecto mismo. Explorar el proceso como esencia del proyecto. -Incorporar al diseño datos externos al mismo. Aprender a programar, automatizar y después matizar decisiones. Generar proyectos adaptativos y reactivos en continua reinformación. -Explorar los límites de lo codificado: producción de codigos como asistentes y no como imposiciones. -Interrelacionar decisiones de equipos. Generar marcos y rutinas para el diseño colaborativo. -Explorar topologías y prototipos, entornos de incertidumbre y posibilidades. Manejo de bases de datos y flujos de herencia y transporte de datos. - Generación dinámica, evolutiva y modificable. Producción de herramientas de codigo abierto.
http://dpa-etsam.com/iam/iam-cursos
https://www.facebook.com/iamadridETSAM?fref=ts
+34 91 336 6537 / 6589…
it seems that was this. Now all is working fine !
Glad that it worked! But I am still a bit worried. Gismo components only modify the gdal-data/osmconf.ini file and no other MapWinGIS file. So your MapWinGIS installation files should not be compromised. The fact that you did not get the "COM CLSID" error message when running the "Gismo Gismo" component suggests that MapWinGIS has been properly installed. So I wonder if the cause for the permanent "invalid shapes" warning has again something with the fact that your system is again not allowing the MapWinGIS to properly edit the osmconf.ini. Maybe this problem will appear again, and again, and reinstallation of MapWinGIS every time can be somewhat bothersome.
- About the terrain generation, is it possible to have the texture from google or other provider mapped onto the terrain surface from gismo component ? (Same as using the ladybug terrain generator in fact). I try to used the image extracted by ladybug component and then applied it to the gismo terrain but the texture is rotated by 90°.
The issue with the rotation can be solved by swapping/reversing the U,V directions of the terrain surface. A slightly more important issue is that terrain surface generated with Gismo "Terrain Generator" component might have a bit smaller radius than what the radius_ input required. This stems from the fact that the terrain data first needs to be downloaded in geographic coordinate system, and then projected. Some projecting issues may occur at the very edges of the projected terrain, so I had to slightly cut out the very edges of the terrain which results in the actual terrain diameters being slightly shorted in both directions. This means that if you apply the same satellite image from Ladybug "Terrain Generator" component to Gismo "Terrain Generator" component the results may not be the same.I attached below a python component which tries to solve this issue by extending the edges of Gismo "Terrain Generator" terrain, and then cutting them with the cuboid of the exact dimensions as the radius_ input. Have in mind that this extension of the original terrain at its edges is not a correct representation of the actual terrain in that location. But rather just an extension of the isoparameteric curve of the terrain surface. So basically: some 0 to 10% (0 to 10 percent of the width and length) of the terrain around all four edges is not the actual terrain for that location, but rather just its extension.The python component is located at the very right of the definition attached below.
Also, if you would like to use the satellite images from Ladybug "Terrain Generator" component along with "OSM shapes", sometimes you may find slight differences in position of the shapes. This is due to openstreetmap data not being based on Google Maps (that's what Ladybug "Terrain Generator" component is using), but rather on Bing, MapQuest and a few others.
- About the requiredKeys_ input of OSM shapes, I understand what you mean and your advice, but in most cases I use it, the component was working fine even without input. I think it's better to extract all tags, values and keys of the selected area, instead of searching for specific ones as I try to find all data related to what I want after, isn't it ? To check what keys are present on the area also.
Ineed, you are correct.I though you were trying to only create a terrain, 3d buildings and maybe find some school or similar 3d building, for these two locations. The recommendation I mentioned previously is due to shapefiles having a limit (2044) to how many keys it can contain. This requires further testing of some big cities locations with maybe larger radii, which I haven't performed due to my poor PC configuration. But in theory, I imagine that it may happen that a downloaded .osm file may have more than 2044 keys. In that case shapefile will only record 2044 of them, and disregard the others. That was my point.But again 2044 is a lot of keys, and I haven't been checking much this in practice. For example, when I set the radius_ to 1000 meters, and use your "3 Rue de Bretonvilliers Paris" location I get around 350 something keys, which is way below the 2044.Another reason why one should use the requiredKeys_ input is to make the Gismo OSM components run quicker: for example, the upper mentioned 350 something keys will result in 350 values for each branch of the "OSM shapes" component's "values" output.Which means if you have 10 000 shapes, the "OSM shapes" component will have 10 000 branches with 350 items on each branch (values). This can make all Gismo OSM components very heavy, and significantly elongate the calculation process.With requiredKeys_ input you may end up with only a couple of tens of items per each branch.Sorry for the long reply.…
Added by djordje to Gismo at 8:57am on June 11, 2017
. C++ arose in the early 80's and it is the language in which Rhino itself is written. C# is the next major version in this language family and it is the one used in .NET development. C# first appeared somewhere around 2001 and has gone through 4 major upgrades since then.
Grasshopper is written in C# and VB.NET (which is the .NET flavour of the Visual Basic language family) and the script components also allow only C# and VB.NET, none of the other c-style or vb-style languages out there.
There is no way to flawlessly convert code from C++ to C#. The two languages have non-overlapping features. Simple mathematical algorithms though tend to be highly portable.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…
nto a max deviation from the original geometry of 0.015 (I don't know if this is acceptable) and speeds up the projection by approx 65% and the splitting by more than 80%.
Regarding the long times, it seems that after a certain amount of holes the solution time increases at a higher rate - for example cutting 100 holes takes about 1 seconds, while cutting 800 holes takes more than 2 minutes.
You could split the 30000 holes in smaller groups (using domains and sublists), calculate the resulting geometry, bake it and use it as the base geometry for the next cutting operation - it's a bit tedious but much more reliable IMO than having a computer working for days.
best,
Marco…
would fade out over time when the zoom dropped below 80%.
One-Over-X component would consistently return the highest possible Integer or Floating point number.
Download the new release from the usual place.
If you didn't see the What's New list for 0.8.0008 you can read it on this post.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia…