algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Comment
Linear city planning, while aiming for efficiency, often neglects the organic growth and diversity crucial for vibrant communities. Restricting development to a linear path limits creativity, cultural expression, and social interaction. Instead of fostering dynamic urban landscapes, it creates monotonous environments. Here I would like you to explore https://casinosanalyzer.ca/online-casinos/mobile for innovative spaces at Canadian Mobile Casinos 2023 - Best Mobile Casinos Online Canada . Embracing a more flexible, adaptive approach would better serve our evolving societal needs.
Linear city planning is a bad idea because it leads to cities that are too big and too expensive to live in. The biggest cities have been built in this way, but they are not the most livable ones. It would be better to have cities that are smaller and more compact. You can read https://www.channelfocuscommunity.net/forum/general-channel-discuss... to learn more about this. What makes linear city planning so bad is that it takes away all the fun of a city. It removes all of the things that make cities unique and special, and replaces them with a boring uniformity that does nothing for anyone but the developers.
Not too complicated but works well to sort lots of curves for making a smooth surface from topo lines. Problem with the file we were given was there were many broken curves and some areas which were missing information. So this sorted them into different categories to make sure there weren't too many points on any line, to make a very large site accurate.
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by
You need to be a member of Grasshopper to add comments!