Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Future Looks Bright: The End of Modernism In Architecture

HOW THINGS BEGIN

We have been hearing of the end of modernism for a long time, why is it still here? Art movements are founded on a philosophy as well as being fixed in the era the movement operates in. It is always difficult to mark a specific start and end date for cultural and artistic eras. Movements feed off and feed into one another, and the shift to a new movement tends to be more gradual than we are led to believe.

The overarching movements prior to Modernism were various forms of Neo-Classicism in competition with forms of Arts and Crafts. The former was steeped in order, colonialism and the state, while the latter looked at the local vernacular. Both in their own way were dealing with the industrial revolution which started around 1760-1800. One embraced it as a tool to manufacture and structure traditional and classical motifs, while the other rejected it as a harbinger of unhealthy squalor and “ugliness”, embracing an idealized past of local design and hand-crafts.

THE MODERN STYLE:

The modernists were the first designers to see industrialization as its own style. Standardization, machines and mass-production were welcomed as aesthetic concepts. The building, any building, was a machine. A machine to live in, a machine to study in, a machine to work in etc. The resulting architecture was a highly simplified and functional aesthetic.

Modernists rejected both classical and vernacular aesthetics. Both were seen as superfluous decorations on a machine. In this way they rejected culture and context as having any importance in design. In that way Architecture became an international If a Model-A Ford automobile in New York or Mumbai does not change its design, then neither should a building-machine.

However, this narrative simplifies reality. Architects never really reject all earlier ideas. Both Corbusier and Mies used classical proportions and motifs in their designs, although neither care much for context. Luis Kahn got inspired by Egyptian and Indian vernacular history and so on.

There were two branches of architecture that did embraced international modernism more than any other, Capitalism and Socialism. Both due in large part to the cost reduction in construction and manufacturing. Architecture that is purely functional, mass produced and non-contextual is cheap. Office towers and social housing became the purest children of the Modernist ideal.

THE END OF MODERNISM …

A common opinion among architects, especially during the period of post-modernism, was that the end of Modernism can be placed and dated to St Louis, Missouri on July 15, 1972 at 3.32pm when the Pruitt-Igoe social housing scheme were dynamited. This has not proven to be completely accurate with modernism persisting to this day.

Arguably Pruitt-Igoe marked perhaps a split in Modernism. On one side Commercial-modernism (Commercialism) and High-modernism (Post-Modernism to Minimalism) on the other. Commercialism stuck to the simplicity of mass production and globalism, with some superficial style variations, while High-Modernism focused more on variations through a rigorous design process.

In the early 21st century even High-Modernists like Eisenman admitted that Modernism was at the end of its relevance. We no longer live in the industrial age of the past. The world has entered a new Industrial Revolution with intellectual automation, mass-customization and environmental awareness.

But Commercialism persists. IKEA is by any standard the highest end of the modern era. Simple, mass-produced modern designs made for the consumer market. IKEA has for many years been testing out modular construction in the housing market. This current trend for modular housing, especially the “micro-apartment” variety is the pinnacle of Modernism. Mass-produced, functional and simple.

More in my blog:

https://www.thorarchitects.com/the-end-of-modernism-in-architecture/

#architecture #parametric #architecturelovers #modernarchitecture #thorarchitects #computationaldesign #avantgarde #parametricdesign #grasshopper3d #contemporaryarchitecture #architecturelover #architects

Views: 200

Comment

You need to be a member of Grasshopper to add comments!

Comment by Morgan Rohla on December 11, 2023 at 1:19am

Improve Future Looks Bright: The End of Modernism in Architecture" beautifully navigates the evolving landscape of architectural design, ushering in a new era marked by innovation and diversity. The insightful exploration of this transition captures the essence of a promising tomorrow, where creativity knows no bounds. As architects redefine boundaries, the integration of novel concepts prompts contemplation about the future's aesthetic allure. In this context, one might wonder, what is the meaning of fractional cmo? A question that adds an intriguing layer to the discourse, much like the transformative shift in architectural paradigms highlighted in this thought-provoking piece.

Comment by Andy Murray on August 23, 2022 at 1:06am

Modernism In Architecture is a very important part of our society and it's time to change the way we treat architecture. The first thing I love about Modernism In Architecture is that it was created in a very different time and place, where people didn't have much to say about anything. So they built what they could build, even if it wasn't very good. Try this https://masterbundles.com/best-modern-powerpoint-templates/ site to download modern power point templates. They didn't have any rules or expectations for what a building should look like, so they made whatever they wanted.

About

Translate

Search

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service