Search Results - vr金星15分彩计划软件手机版式『1TBH·COM』福彩2017324开奖2023年3月19日5时51分39秒.H5c2a3.l3lldvl9l

Event: Arduino for interaction (livello base-medio): 15, 16 marzo al Mediterranean FabLab: ssibili e facili da usare. Il corso parte dalle basi della programmazione di arduino fino ad arrivare all’interazione tra un oggetto fisico ed un imput informativo. tutor: Gianpiero Picerno Ceraso Programma: I giorno Introduzione al Phisical Computing, input digitali e analogici, le basi del linguaggio di programmazione, esempi applicativi; led, pulsanti, fotorestistenze, servo motore, sensore di temperatura, di flessione, sensori di movimento, potenziometri. II giorno Arduino ethernet, uso di un relè per carichi elevati, accelerometro, introduzione a Processing, interazione di Arduino e Processing, Introduzione a Grassoppher e Firefly e interazione con Arduino. orario corso: 10:00 – 13:00 e 14:00 – 17:00 (pausa pranzo 13:00 – 14:00) costo: 150€ + IVA deadline: 13 marzo numero minimo di partecipanti: 3 Per iscrizioni scrivi a info@medaarch.com specificando nome, cognome, mail, recapito telefonico e il nome del corso al quali sei interessato. In seguito all’invio del modulo di pre-iscrizione, i partecipanti riceveranno una mail contenente tutte le specifiche di pagamento. Per seguire il cluster su Arduino è necessario installare il software Arduino 1.0.5 al seguente linkhttp://arduino.cc/en/Main/Software#.Ux3hQj95MYE facendo attenzione a scaricare quello relativo al proprio sistema operativo, Windows 32 o 64 e Mac OS. Software necessari solo per una parte del corso: Processing 2.1.1 https://processing.org/download/?processing Rhino 5 http://www.rhino3d.com/it/download Grasshopper for Rhino5http://www.grasshopper3d.com/page/download-1Firefly http://fireflyexperiments.com/ Il cluster rientra in un fitto calendario di attività formative organizzate dalla Medaarch per lanno 2013-2014.…; Added by Francesca Luciano at 8:36am on March 11, 2014

Topic: Very Large Gasshopper files, Collaboration, UI ideas: feed back: Last year a group of graduate students at McGill did this: http://web.farmmresearch.com/pavilion/ I was a member of this group and was one of the people involved in the creation of the grasshopper file (see screen shot at bottom of post - please excuse the spelling errors if you find them). There were effectively no drawings, only the grasshopper script, a bit of post processing in soildworks, cnc fabrication, and hand assembly using labels etched in at the time of cnc fabrication. As you can see from the screen shot the GH file is a hellish nightmare, right on the edge of the memory limit of rhino 4 (which we had to use because of a minor difference in the way rhino 5-GH handled sweeping), and, towards the end, it took about 15 minutes of computer time just to get to the point were we could work on the script because of all the calculations need in the stack. Here is a list of things that would have really helped us: 1. More programming experience. i had a bit, most others didn't. David can't help to much with this in a direct way. 2. Clusters: at the time we started clusters didn't work well, by the time they did we were almost done - oh well. I do have some ideas about how it would be nifty for clusters to have version control so that the master assembly could revert thinks that cause other things to break. - I'm sure this can be done manually right now but i have never tried it. could GH be plumbed into something like svn? 3. Concurrent editing - Like a video game. It would, i imagine, require some sort of cloudy file storage and server solution or something but there were MANY hours were 3 or more people were crowded around one computer trying to solve a problem. Alowing everyone to have there own view of the file that stayed in sync would just have been more comfortable... 4. Progress bars and the UI and Display running in a separate thread from the solver. Davids addition of esc to allow us two sometimes save ourselves if we connected a wire wrong but often not. It would be cool to be able to interact with the grasshopper file right away and sill know that the solver was working away (especially when a single run of the file took 15 minutes). Progress bars would be nice on any component taking more than a second or two to run (which was the case with many of our components - especially the ones that we wrote ourselves) but they only make sense to add after the threads for the solver and the UI have been separated. So, anyone else done a really huge GH file? Thoughts? …; Added by Dieter Toews at 7:43pm on September 3, 2013

Event: AA Greece Visiting School 2014: lite’ of education that promotes the Architectural Association’s exclusive, intensive form of teaching and learning around the country. AA Greece VS aims on visiting a different city each year and construct a single large-scale model which will act as an active nod of communication among the various locations. In 2014, the School will initiate its design agenda with an architectural approach that is focused on the aspect of connection. The city of Patras which is the starting node of AA Greece VS, was chosen by the European Commission to be the European Capital of Culture for the year 2006. The concept of the event revolved around the main theme of "Bridges" and "Dialogues", drawing benefit from the city's rich history and its position as a "Gate to the West", to underline the essence of the productive interaction of culture and civilizations in Europe. The AA Greece Visiting School investigates how well existing buildings with various sightlines and variant spatial grammars perform according to human perception. In sync with the flexible and adaptive concept of parasitical structures, the research focuses on the making of transformable large-scale creations that accentuate prominent architectural features of existing buildings. The research looks at how cultural factors, specific preferences, experiences, and expectations can lead to the transformation of architectural parasitical structures. Discounts 1. Standard application The AA Visiting School requires a fee of £600 per participant, which includes a £60 Visiting Membership. If you are already a member, the total fee will be reduced automatically by £60 by the online payment system. Fees are non-refundable. 2. Group registration For group applications, there will be a range of discounts depending on the number of people in the group. The discounted fee will be applied to each individual in the group. 1. 3-6 people group: £60 (AA Membership fee) + 540*0.75 = £465 (25 %) 2. 7-15 people group: £60 + 540*0.70 = £438 (30%) 3. more than 15 people group: £60 + 540*0.65 = £411 (35%) 3. AA students For current AA students studying in Undergraduate or Graduate programs, a discount of 50% will be made for each participant. (AA students are exempt of paying the £60 membership fee.) Eligibility The workshop is open to architecture and design students and professionals worldwide. Participants receive the Architectural Association certificate of participation upon completion. Applications The deadline for applications is 15 September 2014. Online application form and payment required. No portfolio/CV required. The online application can be reached from the link below: https://www.aaschool.ac.uk/STUDY/ONLINEAPPLICATION/visitingApplication.php?schoolID=273 Contact: Alexandros.Kallegias@aaschool.ac.uk…; Added by Alexandros Kallegias at 7:38am on May 25, 2014

Event: cursos intensivos de diseño paramétrico con Grasshopper Julio 2011: minativo (15, 16 y 17 de julio) - MÓDULO 3. Curso de scripting con Grasshopper, Processing y Arduino: modelado iterativo, interacción y sensorización (22, 23 y 24 de julio) Más información y reserva de plazas. ¡Consulta los descuentos para estudiantes de grado y posgrado y para más de un miembro del mismo estudio! Los cursos serán impartidos en Madrid por dos Authorized Rhino Trainers.…; Added by Miguel Vidal at 3:46am on April 29, 2011

Topic: Curves back to text: I kept adding new text every day until now... and now I have to change almost all the text I did type but... it's made of curves! So I was wondering if anyone has ever had similar problems solved by a gh definition In case no-one has ever had similar troubles (I think you all here are smarter than me :P) how would you proceed to create a similar definition, given all the text has same dimension and font? I would: a) create a set with all the possible character-curve in that Font b) create an identical set with the same characters as type c) compare this set with every given text-curve in the drawing (issue: the number 8 is made of 3 different curve .___. same as letter B... A has 2, as D, R, O, P, p and so on...) d) list item from set 'b' using pattern I get from 'c' e) evenctually -this is a moonshot in the moonshot- concatenate characters at 'd' based on proximity of different character-curves (to get "ABC" as a whole text, instead of "A" "B" and "C" as separate instances) It sounds kind of challenging! ...maybe I'm better start re-writing text NOW as it could EASILY take me a couple of days to get things done... :)…; Added by Ale Inno at 7:24pm on August 25, 2015

Comment on: Topic 'GH python 2dArray question': tically give you back all the items of the list. However, if you give it a list of lists (as you are in this example) it doesn't know to extract the items in the internal lists. The script I suggest simply reinterprets each list as a single item, and relies on the component data processing to split out the items list by list. This also has the advantage (over 筑梦NARUTO's solution) of keeping each list in its own grasshopper data tree branch. If you'd rather avoid the clunkiness of a second script component, you'll have to compose a datatree yourself. That will look something like this: import math as m import Rhino from Grasshopper.Kernel.Data import GH_Path from Grasshopper import DataTree pi = m.pi angle =0 pts = DataTree[Rhino.Geometry.Point3d]() c=0 for i in rs.frange(0,5,0.5): angle +=(pi/30) layer = [] for j in rs.frange(0,2*pi,pi/15): x= 5*m.sin(j+angle) y= 5*m.cos(j+angle) layer.append( Rhino.Geometry.Point3d(x,y,i)) pts.AddRange(layer,GH_Path(c)) c = c+1 a = pts …; Added by Andrew Heumann at 8:53pm on May 31, 2014

Event: COMPUTATIONAL ALCHEMY - Advanced Design Workshop: 2013 | Sábados 19 y 26 de octubre. 15 Hrs. Horario: 9:00 - 18:00 Hrs. Instructores por BIO|Architecture Studio: A design & building laboratory. Palabras clave: Diseño Computacional, Scripting, Rhinoceros 5.0 + Grasshopper, Parametrización, Análisis, Fabricación Digital, 3D print. Para mayor información: MArch. Kathrin Schröter. E-mail: kschroter@itesm.mx Dirección de Arquitectura. Oficinas de Aulas 1, segundo piso. Carretera Lago de Guadalupe Km.3.5 Col. Margarita Maza de Juarez, Atizapan de Zaragoza. | 5864 55 55 Ext.5750.…; Added by David Hernández at 9:00pm on September 13, 2013

Comment on: Topic 'Boot camp MAC - Grasshopper ( Multicore? )': ences, so not terribly important in the end. After all, it's not really worth going through a lot of trouble to get a 15% speed increase; 15% faster than slow is still pretty slow. Also processor speed has pretty much peaked these past few years, there have been no more significant increases lately. Instead, manufacturers have started putting more cores on motherboards, which is something GH unfortunately cannot take advantage of. Multi-threading (very high on the list for GH2) brings with it a promise of full core utilisation (minus the inevitable overhead for aggregating computed results), but there are some problems that may end up being significant. Here's a non-exhaustive list: It's not possible to modify the UI from a non-UI thread. This is probably not that big a deal for Grasshopper components, especially since we can make methods such a Rhino.RhinoApp.WriteLine() thread safe. Not all methods used by component code are necessarily thread safe. There used to be a lot of stuff in the Rhino SDK that simply wouldn't work correct or would crash if the same method was run more than once simultaneously. Rhino core team has been working hard to remedy this problem, and I'm confident we can fix any problems that still come up, though it may take some time. If components rely on other code libraries then the problem may not be solvable at all. So we need to make sure multi-threading is an optional property of components. There's overhead involved in multi-threading, it's especially difficult to get a good performance gain when dealing with lots of very fast operations. The overhead in these cases can actually make stuff perform slower. There's the question on what level should multi-threading be implemented. Obviously the lower the better, but that means a lot of extra work, complicated patterns of responsibilities and a lot of communications between different developers. There's the question on how the interface should behave during solutions now. If all the computation is happening in a thread, the interface can stay 'live'. So what should it look like if a solution takes -say- 5 seconds to complete? Should you be able to see the waves of data streaming through the network, turning components and wires grey and orange like strobe lights? What happens if you modify a slider during a solution? Simple answer is to abort the current solution and start a new one with the new slider value. But as you slowly drag the slider from left to right, you end up computing 400 partial solution and never getting to a final answer, even though you could have computed 2 full solutions in the same time and given better feedback. Does the preview geometry in the Rhino viewports flicker in and out of existence as solutions cascade through the network? …; Added by David Rutten at 9:21am on March 4, 2015

Event: informed skins | data-driven envelopes – GH workshop – Vienna: ugh information (whether coming from environmental analysis or any kind of database), extracting and managing informations for construction processes all require an understanding of data structures in order to build seamless design-to-construction pipelines. Through visual scripting in Grasshopper (Generative modeling plug-in for Rhinoceros) participants will learn how to build and develop parametric data structures (from basic simple lists to complex data trees), data-driven geometry and envelopes and how to extract relevant informations from such models for construction processes. Participants will also develop a personal envelope project and its full design-to-construction pipeline. [.]TopicsTheory: - Lecture: “Data Obsession” – computational designer as a new professional profile and the role of information and complexity in contemporary architectureTechnique: - Software interface - Components - Lists & Data Tree: management, manipulation, visualization - Geometry generation from data stream - Base exercises (Box morph, Image sampler, Floor sections, Attractor field, Multisection Pipe, Paneling) - Advanced exercise: Data-reactive component – data-reactive tessellation on NURBS surface. Data coming from environmental analysis or spreadsheet table - Advanced exercise: Data extraction from previous tessellation, visualization and storage in spreadsheets. - Advanced exercise: geometry optimization for construction[.]Software & skills:Basic modeling skills in Rhino are required. Participants should bring their own laptop with pre-installed software (software download links will be given after subscription).[.]Tutors:Alessio Erioli + Andrea Graziano – Co-de-iT (GH & design tutors).[.]Venue:The workshop venue will be:Polycollege WienJohannagasse 21050 Wienhttp://www.vhs.at/johannagasse.html[.]Calendar & Timetable:The workshop will have the following timetable throughout all the 4 days: 9:00-13:00 lesson+tutoring 14:00-17:00 lesson+tutoring[.]Subscription fees:For participants who register before 30/08/2012 we offer a EARLY BIRD feesE.B. – educational* : € 320 + VAT E.B. – professional: € 390 + VATafter 30/08/2012 will be in place the STANDARD fees:STANDARD fees – educational* : € 390 + VAT STANDARD fees – professional: € 490 + VAT* students, teachers, researchers & PhD (proof of status required).The deadline for registration is 06/09/2012; The workshop has a maximum of 30 places available and will be activated with a minimum number of 15 partecipants.[.]Application:To register please fill this FORM and send it via e-mail to:3ddreaming@gmail.com or ck@kkkc.at[.] Organized by:This workshop is organized by Co-de-iT in collaboration with:3d-dreaming.com – Architecture from a digital point of viewKKKC – Mediaware trading GmbH…; Added by Christian Kobierski at 9:15am on August 20, 2012

Comment on: Topic 'Finding an optimal size of PV panel in given array.': nderstand each other quite well. I will pick one piece of the PVsurface at the bottom row: So the label "1" represents the PVsurface for which the shading diagram will be created. Label "2" is the back facade (made of glass or opaque elements, does not matter).Label "3" represents the row of PVsurfaces above. Now take a look at how the shading diagram would look like for the mentioned PVsurface. I made some of its parts a bit incorrect on purpose, so that I could clearly the differences a bit easier: Label "1" would be first type of self-shading. It's the shading which prevents the PVsurface to "see" anything behind its back.Label "2" would be shading from the facade wall to which the PV surfaces are attached to. I deliberately colored it blue, to distinguish it from other two types of the shading. Otherwise it would look black.Label "3" is the second type of self-shading: the shading from the above row of PV surfaces.In literature, you won't find the terms: first and second type of self-shading. I invented them.To my knowledge, when self-shading is mention, this will probably be related with label "3" (second type of self-shading). It's the shading from the adjacent rows of PV modules in front, or like in this case above.So when I said: You do not have to supply the surfaces additionally to the context_ input. The component will "under the hood" add them to the context_ input to account for self shading. Last year this hasn't been the case, but after the suggestion by Chris Mackey, I changed this feature. This was related to the first type of self shading (label "1"). And when I said: However, as we are using the PV SWH System size component, there will be no self-shading. The PV SWH System size component positions the PV rows in such a way, that no self shading will appear for the given minimalSpacingPeriod_ criteria. This was related to the second type of self shading (label "3"). I should also mention that I made the upper photo a bit incorrect. If you would do the shading analysis, the label "3" would be almost non-existent. Here is how the shading diagram would actually look like: As mentioned this is because PV SWH System size component will position each PVsurface row in such a way, so that there would be no second type of self shading for the chosen minimalSpacingPeriod_ criteria. In our case, as the minimalSpacingPeriod_ criteria we chose the summer solstice in the Northern Hemisphere from 10 to 14 hours. We should have taken from 9 to 15, but we took from 10 to 14 to as on option of lowering the distance between the PV rows.This means that there will be no second type self-shading all year round from 10 to 14 hours. Let me know if all of this helps in any way.…; Added by djordje to Ladybug Tools at 12:10pm on May 28, 2016