Search Results - 分分快3最准高手助赢计划-『8TBH·COM』福利彩票开奖结果012期查询--2023年3月19日6时48分50秒.H5c2a3.5jexii16x-gov-hk

Topic: GH for President: ). It deals with the potential possibility to port GH into AEC fields (real-life AEC fields, nothing to do with academic thinking). The bad news are that the smart AEC sector is occupied solely by Bentley/GenComp – expect soon Revit/Dynamo as well (not to mention CATIA). The good news are that there’s millions of designers/engineers/industrial designers out there who could be interested for a 3rd alternative. Intro: Well, in the old days (when men had mustache and muttonchops) AEC design performed in a nice top-to-bottom sequence (kinda like a vector) : the Big Man (aka The Brain) did some sketches (with crayons) and the rest (known as the “others”) struggled to make The Idea a reality. Today things are different, mind. Or they should be different. Or may be different. Or whatever. The big easy:For a zillion o reasons (AEC matures, PLM, cost, outsourcing, sustainable engineering…add several more) this vector like process of the past is like a Brown motion these days: Right down the moment that you (or your team) “sketch” The Big Idea … another team design simultaneously (i.e. in parallel) the components (parts) that compose the whole. This is the so called bottom-to-top design mentality. So the whole and the parts meet in some "middle point" instead the later being dictated by the former. In quite a few occasions parts dictate the whole (cost, cost and cost being the main reasons). The more a design is contemporary the more this bottom-to-top thing plays a critical role. Ignore it and have a very big time (sooner or later).The bad news:If you accept the above…well GH – at present phase - is not ready for contemporary AEC work. At.All.3 Main reasons for that:1.You can’t use parametric parts (i.e. nested blocks to speak Rhino language) into a given definition (in this case attached : truss nodes, connection flanges, mount plates, cable tensioners, planar glazing components, roof skin components…etc etc). This is obviously a Rhino domain.2.You can’t bake a given solution in such a way that the Rhino file is structured (i.e. assemblies of nested blocks). Or you can do it theoretically writing some VB/C code – but the core of the matter is that corresponding components are MIA. That means that you can’t export anything useful actually into established AEC oriented apps and/or established MCAD apps (for doing/calculating the parts for real-life production).3.The GH process can’t being interrupted. Imagine defining, say, a building “envelope” in GH and then …er…use Evolute tools in order to optimize things (say quad planarization and the likes). Then …continue in GH for more detailed work. Then design the parts as in 1 above. Then back to Evolute. Then back to GH.So…if anyone is interested I would be glad to start the mother of all debates and/or some kind of crusade (GH for President, that is).PS: This definition is a WIP thing – more refined stuff to follow (in particular a complex canopy tubes pre-stress system). PS: Tree8 components are used sporadically. PS: Use Saved Views May the Dark Force be with us.Best, Peter …; Added by peter fotiadis at 1:09am on February 13, 2012

Topic: Rhino v5 issues and feedback: lC_UtilEigenSystemSym (level 1) { Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. TargetInvocationException } Object: MillC_UtilEigenSystemSym (level 2) { Could not load file or assembly 'Sawapansolversnet, Version=1.0.4490.29339, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. FileNotFoundException } Object: MillC_Topostruct2D (level 1) { Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. TargetInvocationException } Object: MillC_Topostruct2D (level 2) { Could not load file or assembly 'Sawapansolversnet, Version=1.0.4490.29339, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. FileNotFoundException } Object: MillC_Topostruct3D (level 1) { Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. TargetInvocationException } Object: MillC_Topostruct3D (level 2) { Could not load file or assembly 'Sawapansolversnet, Version=1.0.4490.29339, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. FileNotFoundException } Object: MillC_FEASystem (level 1) { Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. TargetInvocationException } Object: MillC_FEASystem (level 2) { Could not load file or assembly 'Sawapansolversnet, Version=1.0.4490.29339, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. FileNotFoundException } Object: MillC_UtilFFT1D (level 1) { Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. TargetInvocationException } Object: MillC_UtilFFT1D (level 2) { Could not load file or assembly 'Sawapansolversnet, Version=1.0.4490.29339, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. FileNotFoundException } Object: MillC_UtilFFT2D (level 1) { Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. TargetInvocationException } Object: MillC_UtilFFT2D (level 2) { Could not load file or assembly 'Sawapansolversnet, Version=1.0.4490.29339, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. FileNotFoundException } EDIT: Even with COFF disabled in GrasshopperDeveloperSettings this still happens (Thanks Jon) Is millipede not compatible with Rhino version 5? Or is there a different .dll to use? Having loaded some of the components: I congratulate you on following Rutten's 3rd law of Grasshopper :) Although I hope the Solver and especially the Stress lines get further refinement in order to differentiate them as I find it hard to read the small label at the bottom. Maybe the Chimney's can have different numbers 3 = 3D, 2 = 2D etc. …; Added by Danny Boyes to Millipede at 3:18am on April 25, 2012

Topic: mesh edge topology: how does it work? how is that sorted when offseting a mesh?: al surface, but this is not happening with the edge mesh list! In fact when I want to create mesh faces (the side mesh faces to close the boundaries surfaces) I can see (and I have tested/x2 checked within GH), that the corrispondent top edge and bottom edge of a determinated face are not coincident. How can I assign a consistent index list to the top and bottom mesh edge list? How the edge topology is assigned? I post here the code, FYI, even I do not think that can help to find the problem. And 2 screenshot to show you the problem. double thickness = new double(); if (!DA.GetData(0, ref thickness)) return; Mesh baseMesh = new Mesh(); if (!DA.GetData(1, ref baseMesh)) return; List<Plane> localCSPlanes = new List<Plane>(); if (!DA.GetDataList<Plane> (2, localCSPlanes)) return; List<Mesh> solidMesh = new List<Mesh>(); List<Point3d> meshFaceCenterPlus = new List<Point3d>(); List<Point3d> meshFaceCenterMinus = new List<Point3d>(); List<Plane> localCSPlanesPlus = new List<Plane>(); List<Plane> localCSPlanesMinus = new List<Plane>(); List<Line> edgeMeshPlusLine = new List<Line>(); List<Line> edgeMeshMinusLine = new List<Line>(); Mesh offsetPlus = baseMesh.Offset(0.5*thickness, false); Mesh offsetMinus = baseMesh.Offset(-0.5 * thickness, false); Mesh recMesh = new Mesh(); solidMesh.Add(offsetPlus); solidMesh.Add(offsetMinus); //This for-cycle creates a index-consistent list of plus-offset mesh face center points and local coordinate system mesh planes. int nFcsPl = offsetPlus.Faces.Count; int nEdg = offsetPlus.TopologyEdges.Count; for (int i = 0; i <= nFcsPl - 1; i++) { meshFaceCenterPlus.Add(new Point3d(offsetPlus.Faces.GetFaceCenter(i))); localCSPlanesPlus.Add(new Plane(offsetPlus.Faces.GetFaceCenter(i), localCSPlanes[i].XAxis, localCSPlanes[i].YAxis)); } //This for-cycle creates a index-consistent list of minus-offset mesh face center points and local coordinate system mesh planes. int nFcsMn = offsetMinus.Faces.Count; int nEdgMn = offsetMinus.TopologyEdges.Count; for (int i = 0; i <= nFcsMn - 1; i++) { meshFaceCenterMinus.Add(new Point3d(offsetMinus.Faces.GetFaceCenter(i))); localCSPlanesMinus.Add(new Plane(offsetMinus.Faces.GetFaceCenter(i), localCSPlanes[i].XAxis, localCSPlanes[i].YAxis)); } for (int i = 0; i <= nEdg - 1; i++) { Line lineRecPlus = offsetPlus.TopologyEdges.EdgeLine(i); edgeMeshPlusLine.Add(lineRecPlus); Point3d recPointA = lineRecPlus.From; recMesh.Vertices.Add(recPointA); Point3d recPointB = lineRecPlus.To; recMesh.Vertices.Add(recPointB); Line lineRecMinus = offsetMinus.TopologyEdges.EdgeLine(i); edgeMeshMinusLine.Add(lineRecMinus); Point3d recPointC = lineRecMinus.To; recMesh.Vertices.Add(recPointC); Point3d recPointD = lineRecMinus.From; recMesh.Vertices.Add(recPointD); recMesh.Faces.AddFace(0 + 4 * i, 1 + 4 * i, 2 + 4 * i, 3 + 4 * i); NOTE: I know how to create a solid from a single mesh surface, but this is not what I want now, because I have to sort (for further purpose) the solid mesh in top, bottom and side faces. Thanks a lot for your help! cheers, matteo…; Added by matteo at 7:19am on June 28, 2013

Topic: Lasercut Preparation Script for Site Models (Fold and Wrap): iece could be easily cut using the "plan" curve, the wall need extra attention and manual work to prepare. This script attempts to automate the preparation of lasercutting curves with some control: 1) Height: The parameter is set using the "Name" property of the Rhino "plan" curve object. Number of storeys (e.g. 5) is to be entered in that field and the script will read it after you press F5 (recompute) in grasshopper. If the block models are not multiples of standardised storey height, you could set "Storey height" in grasshopper to 1 and set exact height to individual "plan" curves in Rhino. (Special mention: This part of script including reading "Name" property in Rhino and auto-correcting curve direction is attributed to Victor Leung's Laser Cutting Tool for Block Models) 2) Mode of wrapping: The wall could either be "sitting" on the bottom plate and being completely covered by the top plate, or wrapping outside both the bottom and top plate. In either case, material thickness is taken into consideration and the finished model will remain the same size. 3) Extra height option: In preparing flat roof models, one may like to add extra height for parapet wall to make the model more appealing. 4) Easy picking up: Each individual piece has some uncut part (red lines for engrave) to hold itself in place after cutting. There is no need to use masking tape to stick. Individual pieces could be taken out when you are ready to use. There are also known issues to this script: 1) At internal corners, the adjacent wall will be longer (in wrapping outside mode) or shorter (in sitting inside mode). You have to manual cut at this point. 2) It could not work with only one input curve. (Although it may be a stupid bug,) A dummy rectangle nearby could be created to make it work. Enjoy, Sa Lasercutting Tool for Block Models (Fold and Wrap) by Sa Ng is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/laser-cutting-tool-for-block-models. …; Added by Sa Ng at 8:51am on March 2, 2015

Topic: Difference between MRT calculation methods: . From the Thermal Comfort Indices component, Comfort Index 11 (TCI-11):MRT = f(Ta, Tground, Rprim, e) with:- Ta = DryBulbTemperature coming from ImportEPW component- Tground = f(Ta, N) where N comes from totalSkyCover input. Tground influences the long-wave radiation emitted by the ground in the MRT calculation.- Rprim defined as solar radiation absorbed by nude man = f(Kglob, hS1, ac)- ac is the clothingAlbedo in % (bodyCharacteristics input)- I can't find any definition in the code of Kglob and hS1. Could you tell me please what are those values referencered to? --> probably the globalHorizontalRadiation but how?- e = vapour pressure calculated from Ta and Relative Humidity input Do you agree that in this case the MRT does not depend on these inputs: location, meanRadiantTemperature, dewPointTemperature and wind speed?It does not depend neither on the other bodyCharacteristics like bodyPosture, age, sex, met, activityDuration...? MRT calculated by the TCI-11 method is the mean radiant temperature of a vector pointing vertically with a sky view factor of 100%?For ParisOrly epw, 2. From the SolarAdjustedTemperature component (that seems to be more used for the UTCI calculation examples on Hydra compared to TCI-11). In contrast to the TCI-11, this component distinguishes diffuse and direct radiation and contextualizes the calculation thanks to _ContextShading input, right? It can also be applied to a mannequin thanks to the CumSkyMatrix and thus evaluate the dishomogeneity of radiation exposure.This component seems not to consider the influence of vapour pressure on the result --> is it then more precise to put the MRT output (from the TCI) as an input of meanRadTemperature for SolarAdjustedTemperature?The default groundReflectivity is set to 0.25 --> is GroundReflectivity taken into account in the Tground or MRT calculation in the TCI component? If yes, what is the hypothesised groundReflectivity?The default clothing albedo of 37% (TCI-11 bodyCharacteristics) corresponds to Clothing Absorptivity of 63%? If the CumSkyMatrix input is not supplied, I get 9 results for the mannequin --> where are those points/results coming from? If the CumSkyMatrix input is supplied,I suppose the calculation of the 482 results correspond to a calculation method similar to the radiation analysis component that is averaged over the analysis period. Right?But I don't understand why the mannequin is composed of 481 faces and meshFaceResult gives 482 results. Finally, what is the link between the MESH results, the solarAdjustedMRT and the Effective Radiant field ? Is there a paper to have a detailed explanation of the method? 3. Here are some results for the ParisOrly energyplus weather data. You can find here attached the grasshopper definition.There is no shading in this simulation and the result coming from the ThermalComfort indices for MRT is very different compared to the solar adjusted MRT.Why such a big difference and which of the result should be plugged into the UTCI calculation component? Results for ParisOrly.epwM,D,H:1,1,12 Ta : 6.5°Crh: 100%globalHorizontalRadiation: 54 Wh/m2totalSkyCover: 10MRT (TCI-11): 1.2°C _CumSkyMtxOrDirNormRad = directNormalRadiation : 0 Wh/m2diffuseHorizontalRad: 54 Wh/m2_meanRadTemp = TasolarAdjustedMRT: 10.64°CMRTDelta: 4.14°C _CumSkyMtxOrDirNormRad = CumulativeSkyMtxdiffuseHorizontalRad: 54 Wh/m2_meanRadTemp = TasolarAdjustedMRT: 10.47°CMRTDelta: 3.97°C _CumSkyMtxOrDirNormRad = CumulativeSkyMtxdiffuseHorizontalRad: 54 Wh/m2_meanRadTemp = MRT (TCI-11)solarAdjustedMRT: 5.17°CMRTDelta: 3.97°C Thanks a lot for your helpRegards, Aymeric …; Added by Aymeric to Ladybug Tools at 8:29am on May 2, 2016

Topic: Gismo 0.0.1 released !: hope this number will grow in future. Currently available features are: 1) Creation of 2d or 3d context for any kind of building related analysis: automatically generate the 2d/3d surrounding buildings for the location where you would like to perform visibility, solar radiation, cfd or any other type of analysis. You need some other plugin for the last three, like Ladybug. It only creates the context=surroundings! The "automatic generation" process also includes creation of the local topography (terrain) along with buildings. 2) Identification of certain 2d or 3d elements in the created context. For example: selection of all hotels, parks, hospitals, restaurants, residential buildings etc. 3) Performing direct terrain analysis (hillshading, slope, ruggedness, roughness, water flow...) 4) Creation of terrain shading masks and horizon files for further solar and photovoltaics analysis. Gismo will be very grateful if he could get any suggestions, improvements, bug reports and testing in the following period. In case you are willing to provide any of these, the requirements, installation steps and .gh example files can be found here, here and here. Thank you in advance !!…; Added by djordje to Gismo at 9:10am on January 29, 2017

Topic: Help! link external midi to GH data via UDP: via MIDI controllers. my idea is to link PureData to GH via UDP. why pure data? cause' i can relate data like GH to generate numeric relations (and link it to audio generation) so far i got PD and Processing to talk, but i can't get to grasshopper. i use this definitions to make pd and processing to talk http://ubaa.net/shared/processing/udp/ and this GHX to get the data to GH http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/attachment/download?id=2985220%3... i got this data from this post but the GH definition doesn't work for me. i have tried LAN definitions and "the engine" as well but they both freeze, even if i send data thru processing or PD. i have a lot of questions at this time 1.- why processing tells me that i am getting the data from diferent ports, while i'm using 6000? 2.- why in the UDP definition i get no data out, even if it should say something like "waiting fordata/port/etc.." that's defined in the C# capsule 3.- is there a direct way to get midi data (key and CC) to GH i also tried to use firefly to get the data via COM port. i know you can do this trick in processing but i just don't know how. well. if anyone could help me i would share the results here (since it's a magister, results shoud be very interesting) UDP has allways been a unsolved issue on other posts. maybe we could work it out ;) Thanks…; Added by jota aldunce at 8:43am on September 28, 2010

Topic: Angophora tree trunk. Generate 3~5 "random" points around the perimeter of a shape with a minimum distance apart; each point a small, random distance away from original shape's perimeter.: But not just any gum tree. The angophora, no less: Why? Because I like nature, that's why. Every time I see new designs –especially architectural designs– it worries me that the natural environment is being taken over. Not just that, but even the new materials used in all product designs has to come from nature as well [read: mines]. So. People are forgetting that we still need trees and I believe that if someone sees a beautiful [read: established] tree in their architectural plans, they are going to be much more likely to build around it and not cut it down. That alone would no doubt increase the value of the house. My thinking is that current tree models suck. They look unnatural and I think I know why. They're not random or organic enough. They're not detailed enough. That's basically my 'rationale' for this project. Just look at how different all of these tree trunks are! So I am not being paid for this project. It's a personal project of mine. I'm just worried about the trunk shape for now — I'll worry about all the leaves... when I get to that. I am a grasshopper beginner. Please keep that in mind. I am also fairly hopeless at traditional programming, but I find the visual approach of grasshopper much easier to grasp. So unfortunately I have gotten stuck and need some help, even just a clue, as to how to proceed. That said, here is my current progress: About a year ago, I started modelling with straight trunks using pipe sections, to see if I could get a very basic "tree" shape. And to see if I could join the segments together. Yes it works but it looks hopeless as you can imagine. Then I stopped for a long while. Now I'm back at it, hoping to improve a lot more. I have already made one basic vertical nurbs curve with tangents at either end as the main "trunk". I tried creating two ellipses at each end of the main trunk/curve and lofting between them but it omitted the main curve/rail. So it ended up being an elliptical trunk with straight sides which of course still didn't look right. Then I divided the first main curve up into a number of segments. I think that is a better approach. I have taken the parameters of the curve at each segment (probably the tangent, but I am unsure what the exact parameter is) and used that to form a basic angled plane at each segment/division. I have been able to draw ellipses at each segment and rotate them onto the plane. I was going to loft it together later on. A Curved loft with elliptical cross-sections looks much better than straight a pipe does, but still looks too unnatural. I quickly realised that tree trunks are not elliptical, but rather, shaped more like 'kidneys'. The next step was to create >3 points on each of those planes (spaced fairly evenly around the ellipse so as not to create a really funky/unwanted shape). Maybe it would be better to model with a triangle or other polygon instead of an ellipse. I haven't got that far yet... because here is where I am getting stuck. I managed to find a way of getting three roughly 'triangular' points along each that ellipse. I also managed to create three nurbs cuves in the Z direction which intersected those three points, a bit like three seams down the side of the tree trunk, but couldn't figure out how to loft it all together. I think it was the wrong approach anyway... I'd rather try to create a bunch of nurbs curves at each of the XY planes so as to get more control of the shape. What I am trying to do now is create three roughly triangular-spaced points on a basic ellipse through which I can then draw a simple nurbs curve (think like a cross section of the trunk). I would then like to add some XY-only randomness to the positions of those points. Not Z randomness, otherwise the trunk is going to get messed/kinked up. That's probably very important. Then I would like to loft those nurbs curvs at each XY plane together forming the basic tree trunk, which also tapers based on some other variable (a non-linear factor, not simply distance from ground plane, perhaps something else?). I have attached the GH file. I am also open to suggestions if you have a better way of solving a problem. I would like to retain control over a lot of factor such as number of branches, spacing, average branch length, etc. My main contrsaints are that the entire thing has to be somewhat random and non-linear. …; Added by leslie dean brown at 12:13am on December 27, 2016

Blog Post: Basic lotto Strategies of 58 Lotto: Is there a method to winning the lottery or is it all a matter of luck? this can be one among the foremost frequent queries asked by those that play the lottery. will having a mathematical system…; Added by Jay Rocket at 2:08am on May 30, 2016

Blog Post: AA ROME VISITING SCHOOL | ROME - ITALY | 17 > 26 OCTOBER

Added by Arturo Tedeschi at 4:34am on August 12, 2012

Search Results - 分分快3最准高手助赢计划-『8TBH·COM』福利彩票开奖结果012期查询--2023年3月19日6时48分50秒.H5c2a3.5jexii16x-gov-hk

About

Translate

Search

Photos

Tree-Like Structure

Mountain Mesh

Parametric Wall

Parametric Vase

Planar Curves Shell

Videos

Tree-Like Structure

Mountain Mesh

Parametric Wall

Parametric Vase

Planar Curves Shell

Field Contour