Search Results - 分分快3最准高手助赢计划-『8TBH·COM』福利彩票开奖结果012期查询--2023年3月19日6时48分50秒.H5c2a3.5jexii16x-gov-hk

Event: NEXUS workshop - grasshopper advanced: main attention is set on easy to handle interface , which should be used at a early stage of conceptual design to respond to external and internal influences in a intelligent and sustainable way. Participants will use the software Grasshopper as a parametric modeling plug-in for Rhino. The usage of this graphical algorithm editor tightly integrated with Rhino’s 3-D modeling tools open up the possibility to construct highly parametrical complex models. To generate this complexity we will use live linkages to several programs listed below: • Autodesk Ecotect Analysis and Radiance via GECO • Processing, Excel or Open Office via gHowl • FEA software GSA via SSI In this 3 intense days, the participants should learn the workflow of the plug-ins with the help of examples and get an overview of the different software’s, there possibilities for evaluating the performance of a design or the usage of additional tools to be not chained to a single system . (e.g. parametrical accentuation, parametrical formation, parametrical reaction) TIME AND LOCATION 27th – 29th September 2010Leopold-Franzens university innsbruck/austria Technik Campus | ICT - building Technikerstraße 21a A - 6020 Innsbruck | Austria 47°15’50.71”N 11°20’43.45”E detailed program as pdf-version FOR WHOM All levels are welcome (students & professionals) The only requirement is knowledge of Rhino and Basic Grasshopper. You will need a level which corresponds to the Grasshopper Primer course outline. FEES 21 hours professionals: 395€ students (bachelor/master): 250€. REGISTRATION please send a email to to.from.uto@gmail.com attached with following information : Last Name First Name Date of Birth Nationality Email Address Current Address Profession or proof of student status After submitting you will receive an email with a PayPal link to complete registration.…; Added by to] at 11:30am on August 25, 2010

Event: PGD:EGP v2.0 // Diplomado Universidad Iberoamericana: ración de 150 horas divididas en cuatro módulos, arrancando el 22 de Marzo del 2011 y terminando la segunda semana de Junio con sesiones los Martes y Jueves de 18:00 a 22:00hrs y algunos Sábados de 10:00 a 14:00hrs. El tema central del diplomado es el uso integral de la herramienta digital en el proceso de diseño a partir de la base teórica del fenómeno de la emergencia (entendida como la obtención de resultados complejos a partir de la interacción de elementos simples con reglas de bajo nivel de sofisticación). El desarrollo del programa se concentra en la aplicación práctica de las reflexiones teóricas generadas mediante el uso de herramientas digitales generativas, principalmente Grasshopper (plug-in de modelado parametrico para Rhinoceros). Contaremos con la presencia de dos colaboradores internacionales: EL primero será un miembro de LaN (Live Architecture Network) que impartirá un curso sobre programación avanzada en Grasshopper enfocandolo a la realización de un objeto construido, haciendo énfasis en la transición entre lo virtual, lo análogo y lo físico. El segundo es Jalal el Ali, maestro en arquitectura por la Architectural Association, líder de la Unidad de Geometría Generativa de Buro Happold y actual líder de proyecto en Zaha Hadid Architects, quien dará un curso intensivo enfocado al uso de la herramienta digital y la producción digital, enseñando procesos que ha aplicado en la empresa donde trabaja. Jalal pronunciará también una conferencia magistral. Es un programa promueve el uso de nuevas tecnologías y la integración de procesos de producción desde la concepción del diseño, aplicando los conocimientos teóricos en un objeto físico usando el laboratorio de fabricación de la Universidad Iberoamericana. …; Added by Alberto Lara at 4:17pm on March 17, 2011

Event: Parametric & Generative Architecture & Design Grasshopper Workshop: mbre de 9:00 am a 8:00 pm Este taller está dirigido principalmente a arquitectos y diseñadores interesados en el aprendizaje del diseño paramétrico y generativo aplicados a la generación y racionalización de geometrías complejas para su implementación en diferentes procesos de diseño. En el curso se abordarán los conceptos básicos y metodología para hacer frente a diversas problemáticas del diseño mediante el desarrollo de herramientas algorítmicas a través de un lenguaje de programación visual y el desarrollo de esquemas de fabricación digital. No se requieren conocimientos previos de Rhinoceros 3D ni de programación, conocimientos previos de CAD deseables. Estudiantes: 2,500 MXN Profesionales: 3,000 MXN CONCURSO DE RENDERS - BECA DEL 100% - Parametric & Generative Architecture & Design Grasshopper Workshop. - Publica tu render en www.facebook.com/3dmetrica - El render con más likes será el ganador. - Fecha límite de votaciones 15 de septiembre del 2012. Informes e Inscripciones: workshop@3dmetrica.com 04455 28790084 www.3dmetrica.com www.facebook.com/3dmetrica …; Added by Angel Quintana at 12:28pm on September 5, 2012

Event: ALGOMAD 2016: diseño, construcción y entendimiento de nuestro entorno. BIM está poniendo a disposición de los diseñadores y gestores auténticas bases de datos que pueden generarse, conectarse y editarse de forma paramétrica, proporcionando una sólida capa de realidad a los ejercicios de diseño generativo y computación que son objeto de estudio en Algomad, el seminario que busca popularizar la programación y la parametrización en el diseño y en la experiencia de nuestro entorno construido. Tras un paréntesis en 2015, Algomad vuelve con el objetivo de demostrar cómo una visión computacional del BIM es una oportunidad para mejorar la forma de trabajar de ingenieros, arquitectos, constructoras y operadores de edificios e infraestructuras, tendiendo un puente entre las técnicas de diseño digital más avanzadas y la realidad de la construcción. Algomad 2016 tendrá lugar en el centro de Madrid, en IE School of Architecture and Design, IE University, los días 3, 4 y 5 de Noviembre de 2016 y comprenderá 4 talleres así como ponencias a cargo de expertos de primer nivel. Estructura de Algomad 2016 Algomad 2016 se estructura en torno a tres áreas temáticas principales: BIM, como la metodología total específica para el sector de la construcción. Computación, englobando las aplicaciones de programación y parametrización al diseño de edificios e infraestructuras. Realidad, como marco de trabajo, buscando siempre resolver problemas reales a través de los dos puntos anteriores. Público objetivo Arquitectos, arquitectos técnicos, ingenieros y en general académicos, estudiantes de últimos cursos y profesionales del mundo inmobiliario y de la construcción que compartan un interés por la digitalización de nuestro sector. Se espera un nivel mínimo en el uso de herramientas BIM y de parametrización. Algomad proporcionará formación adicional y gratuita en las herramientas básicas a emplear en los talleres para asegurar un correcto desempeño.…; Added by Frantxo Tabanera Asensio at 3:20am on September 23, 2016

Event: Rhino3D Foundations for Industrial Design: ively and creatively solve today’s product development challenges. Our Rhino3D Foundations for Industrial Design class provides an in-depth look at 2D and 3D tools and methods with Rhino3D, a NURBs surface modeling software. In this class, we will systematically work through Rhino3D’s core features, using them to model the various components of a consumer product. Over the course of 3 days, we’ll cover some foundational topics, including Rhino interface and navigation, Rhino3D object types and properties, creating and editing 2D and 3D geometry, procedural modeling, automation, transforming geometry, Rhino modeling best practices, freeform vs. precision modeling, and exporting geometry. You’ll take away the following: Navigate the Rhino modeling environment Create, edit, and modify curves, surfaces, and solids Precision model using coordinate input and object snaps Use transformation and universal deformation tools Apply best practices for layer management and model annotation Download the course one-pager. Need more information? Connect with us. This class is ideal for: Industrial designers who are new to Rhino3D and want to learn its concepts and technical features in an instructor-led environment. For groups of 10 or more, contact Mode Lab at hello@modelab.is Interested in additional training options? https://www.modelab.is/upcoming-computational-design-events…; Added by Ronnie Parsons at 11:36pm on April 16, 2018

Comment on: Topic 'Grasshopper vs. VBScript vs. Rhinoscript, which tool is better for what and whe…': e think. Also, its easier to catch an error because the malicious component simply turns red/orange (in most cases). However, if you are adept at scripting, you are probably very used to recursive looping & conditional evaluation which you miss majorly in GH (it is possible in very limited ways through using series components or comparer components). So an adept scriptor may soon end up switching back to Rhinoscript unless they find the shift from VBscript to VB.net really fast & smooth (which is rare). GH ofcourse has the advantage of keeping it all 'alive' and changing things with sliders/graphs/image painting, compared to Rhinoscript which is a run-once operation -- so that's where one makes a choice between recursive looping (in RS) & live interactivity (in GH). I'd say RS mostly wins the battle because interactivity is fancy, but recursion can be a necessity. Now to VB.net. The one barrier I have hit most often with GH is speed. If you were working on a fairly large data set, or doing a number of surface/polysurface/brep operations, you hit the performance ceiling real fast, which is when the interactivity becomes almost useless -- because its nowhere close to real time anymore even if you had 12gb ram. Thus steps in VB.net (A bit of clever scripting can make a really significant difference). Working a series of geometric operations in a code component is much faster than doing it through native GH components due to the fact that each native component comes with tonnes off error trapping code, preview generation (I think even if you turn it off, its still being computed, only not displayed), etc. while with VB, you can circumvent a lot of that. If GH were to handle geometry even remotely comparable to what GC/Catia* can do, it would have a long way to go -- I am not sure if that is even the objective. For instance, I am currently working on a tower where all geometry is only meshes and polylines - no degree 3 curves, no surfaces/polysurfaces. This is because if the entire tower is to stay 'alive', Meshes are the lightest option with the amount of geometry being generated. And most of it is through code... there's only the sliders and a couple of other components that are GH native -- and its still in GH due to the interactivity. (I think there's a vast potential with Meshes that GH/Rhino are really not tapping into. There are all the building blocks, but no significant implementation. Giulio's weaverbird plugin is just a small example). *GC/Catia cost significantly more than Rhino itself, and GH is a free plugin to Rhino. Morever, these softwares were written to be parametric modelling softwares from day1, unlike GH which is an add-on over the RhinoSDK, which was never developed from such a perspective. So a very very unfair comparison there, but GH is becoming so significant that its got a forum of its own -- gaining an almost 'independent software' status. I just hope the McNeel marketing people are not listening :)…; Added by Suryansh Chandra at 12:37pm on October 28, 2009

Comment on: Topic 'Custom GHA components and saving/opening GHX files': cess informing the user the network is incomplete. I've been thinking for a while about reading in these blobs of incomprehensible data in an attempt to maintain them through an open/save cycle, but I'll never be able to get this process watertight. 2) When you release components, you should try and make sure that they are backwards compatible previous releases. For example, if you decide to change the number of inputs/outputs or the type of inputs/outputs, this might well break file IO. What you should do in those cases is: - Copy-paste the old component source code and change the ComponentGuid property. In essence, you make a different component which will have the changes. - Change the Exposure property on the old component to be GH_Exposure.hidden. This will hide the component from the interface. This basically means that when people open a file that uses the old style component, they'll get the old-style component. If people instantiate the component anew, they'll get the new component. Grasshopper and it's default gha assemblies feature dozens upon dozens of these hidden components, sometimes there's as many as 4 old-style components out there. 3) If you want to store additional data in the ghx file for a specific component, you'll need to override the Read() and Write() methods. Something like this: Public Overrides Function Write(ByVal writer As GH_IO.Serialization.GH_IWriter) As Boolean writer.SetBoolean("MySpecialBooleanValue", m_myBoolean) writer.SetString("MySpecialStringData", m_myString) Return MyBase.Write(writer) End Function and Public Overrides Function Read(ByVal reader As GH_IO.Serialization.GH_IReader) As Boolean m_myBoolean = False 'Default state m_myString = String.Empty 'Default state reader.TryGetBoolean("MySpecialBooleanValue", m_myBoolean) reader.TryGetString("MySpecialStringData", m_myString) Return MyBase.Read(reader) End Function It is usually possible to make the Reading process smart enough to handle backwards compatibility. You can ask the reader object whether or not a certain value exists and you can then decide whether you can safely use old or new reading logic. So any changes to this part probably don't require you to create a duplicate component and hide the old one. -- David Rutten david@mcneel.com Poprad, Slovakia…; Added by David Rutten at 2:34am on February 26, 2011

Comment on: Topic 'Designing dynamic folded structures?': we're actually using PET sheets for our flexures. We try to design so that the flexures don't go through more than +/- 30 degrees of deflection. If the angular deflection is kept small, the lifetime can definitely be on the order of 1000000 cycles. As for the design process (item 2), ideally the designer would be able to use a simple 3D CAD tool to design a model of a robot, and the geometry would be represented by dimensioning the individual parts in the model. Maybe there should be some parametric primitive kinematic building blocks like four bar linkages, box frames, etc. that a user could build up a robot from. But, the key functionality the tool needs to provide is for the designer to be able to visualize how the robot will move when it's fabricated. This could mean observing (or plotting) the motion of a leg, a wing, or a series of body segments. Ideally, then, the tool would generate an unfolding of the design. How this would work is still very vague - maybe the user would assist in the unfolding, maybe there would be an optimization routine that computes optimal unfoldings based on criteria like minimal waste, or fewest pieces (I would *not* constrain the problem to construction from a single monolithic piece as in origami). The biggest problem we have right now, is that our design process is totally divorced from fabrication. Even if we went through the trouble of extruding individual thin plates in Solidworks and creating an assembly for visualizing the kinematics of a mechanism, that particular representation doesn't transfer easily to the fabrication process because it's essentially monolithic. Item 3: The 2D drawing is simple a drawing done manually in Solidworks. There are different layers for flexure cuts, outline cuts, and potentially any cuts to be made in the plastic flexure layer. Depending on the robot, there may be many separate pieces for different parts and linkages in a single robot. For example, the drawing for a robot containing a fourbar linkage may have the linkage laid out as a physically separate piece consisting of five rigid links connected by four flexure hinges. During assembly, the designer would then fold up that linkage and insert it into the robot wherever it's supposed to go. If you're curious you can see some sample 2D drawings for older designs here: http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ronf/Prototype/ under the "Example Structures" heading. I noticed Kangaroo seems to be a popular choice for physical simulations. I don't really even need to include forces like bending resistance - I'm happy to allow the design tool to approximate flexures as pin joint-type hinges. Once the design is unfolded, the details of how to cut the flexures could be worked out in a post-processing step. I wouldn't expect the tool to be able to realistically simulate the bending of the hinges. I'm going to have to dig a lot deeper into understanding Grasshopper and Kangaroo. I only just got started with Grasshopper today by following the folding plate tutorial on wa11ace.com.au today. …; Added by Aaron Hoover at 5:30pm on March 31, 2012

Comment on: Topic 'Physical sliders': -- Did you try the package Camilo posted earlier and did you get any input by what he set up for processing? (If not I can give you a short guide, but won't if not necessary, you need to install a few libaries along with processing and set your LPDs device number in the processing sketch.. ). Anyway - he got an Input from what he did into GH via a UDP signal read by Firefly or Ghowl. His only problem was, he had the following input when he turned a knob... for instance ... : Knob 1, turn fully right position: (1;129) Knob 2, turned to middle: (2; 64) Kno 2, tuned to left: (3;1) But when he turned button 2; the first input was "gone" since the second signal arrived via UDP; and so was his parametric value and therefor he couldn't use more than one button to assign different values to his parametric model.. Therefor in GH, the UDP Listener gets connected to split and fed into 2 Item lists. The item lists get inserted into a c# script (maybe you can do this in GH differently, but I have no idea how....): Now, you create a C# script in GH. It comes with 2 inputs, I named them "WAHL" for the number channel (which knob), and "wert" for their value. They get connected to the 2 Lists. Both inputs should be set to integers. Then zoom in and add more outputs to the GH C#-component, as many as you have buttons, I named them after LPDs Numeration K1-K8. The code when you doubleclick it as such is, for 2 buttons: if( WAHL == 1){ a = wert; } if( WAHL == 2){ b = wert; } K1 = a; K2 = b; // and under the following section I set the following //<Custom additional code> int a = 1;int b = 1; Just add more lines for more buttons. That's it. It just assigns the input value depending on which button is pressed to a reference object in the #c script, so the value won't get lost. ---- Now my problem is still that through Camilos processing script I don't get any signal from the buttons in the first place, only from the knobs. With the midibus library I did get them though, but his script uses the proMidi library... something to ask around for in the processing forums... …; Added by Christian D to gHowl at 7:59am on January 25, 2013

Comment on: Topic 'Circle stacking on a 3D spherical shape in Grasshopper/Kangaroo': round each gap is called a compact circle packing, and this isn't always possible to achieve exactly on every surface, but luckily for a sphere it is. You can break the problem into 2 parts: -The combinatorics, or connectivity, ie how many circles there are, and which is tangent to which. This is often represented as a mesh, where each vertex is the centre of a circle, and the edges link the centres of the circles which are tangent to each other. -The sizes and centre positions. If you treat the combinatorics as fixed, you can then concentrate on optimizing the radii and locations of the circles to get them as close to tangent as possible. I have done some work on solving these 2 parts simultaneously (see video here), and shared some scripts for this here. Alternatively we can deal with them separately. For the combinatorics you could use something regular, based on subdivision (for a sphere you might want to start with an icosahedron). Alternatively you could use the remeshing tool I recently shared here. This can cover any surface with a mesh of almost equal edge lengths. For the second part there is a force in Kangaroo which can optimize any triangulated mesh so that there is a packing of spheres centred on its vertices (and if the mesh is smooth, this sphere packing also leads to a circle packing). The file cp_mesh1 in the circle packing directory of the new collection of Kangaroo example files I recently posted shows this. As for limiting to a small number of specified radii, this is still tricky, and impossible without compromising some of the other conditions. If you allow some variable gaps between the circles, you can replace each one with the closest from your set of radii. If you do not choose your radii in advance, but generate a packing with continuously varying radii then cluster them, it can give a better fit. Alternatively you can give up the requirement that the packing to be compact and have good tangency, but some gaps with more than 3 sides. Circle packing is a beautiful and surprisingly deep topic. I'd also recommend taking a look at the work of Ken Stephenson, Bobenko Hoffmann and Springborn, and Mathias Höbinger's thesis, which goes into more detail about triangular meshes with tangent incircles. …; Added by Daniel Piker at 5:16pm on May 3, 2014