am doing the paneling tutorial from the first primer..pg 88. i baked it but while selecting the multiple geometries i cannot select individual ones, they are selected as surfaces..is that ok or .....?
Added by SHILPA PANDE at 6:25am on February 16, 2013
. The rules to dispatch the lines are the next:
I start with a list that alternate true/false; like that: true, false, true, false.
If the angles between those lines are greater than 89° I want to inverse the next part of the list:
True, False, True, False, True, False,...
become
True, False, [>89°] False, True, False, True, [>89°] True, False,...
I managed to create a true false list, to check for the greater than 89° angle, to separate the lines relatively to the angles, but I don't know how to inverse part of the list at certain index.
(In the picture, I have written 90° but it should be 89°, I check for greater than 89° and not equal to 90° because in the real rhino model, the lines won't be exactly orthogonal)
If you have another idea to to reach the same result, it's also okay, I tried to find rules to solve the problems, but I may have overlooked other solutions !
And if there is some part of the patch that are correct but there is easier solution, I would love to learn as I am still new to grasshopper.
Thanks for taking the time to read. :)
…
, a1200)}) Is there any way I can make this list into {a1, a2, a3, a4, -a5, -a6, -a7, -a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, -a13, ..... , a1200} ? ( 4 positive signs then 4 negative signs and so on) - alternating every nth in general.
or
2. Is there any way (workaround) to get negative angle value from 2 vectors? I know 'ANGLE (of 2 vectors)' component by itself doesn't work and I know why too. I have feeling that the reflex angle output might be useful but again, matter of list manipulation.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Hyo
…
on for curves, if you make an algorithm that dynamically defines the possition of the controlpoints for NURBS curves as a function of the parameteres in F(t, a1,...,b1,...,c1,...)= x(t, a1, a2...)+y(t, b1, b2...)+ z(t, c1, c2...) or F(x, a, b ,c...)?
…
for waves, that is done with a 'phase shift', add 2*pi/4 radians (for a 90 deg shift) to your sin curve, could also be done using cos instead of sin for an inherent 90 deg shift
Added by mark zirinsky at 7:37pm on November 9, 2016