algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Search Results - 【p26.pw】Googleクイックインデックス社のWebサイトをどうするか.260214075605

Comment on: Topic 'Pain Points in Grasshopper': tuation - fast and with flexible options for meshes. "Project curve to plane" with the parts obscured by a list of brep/mesh obstacles removed. Adobe illustrator (svg?) export with lots of options regarding visual appearance and document structure. Vectorisation of bitmap images. Reconstruction of perspective and (textured) 3d geometry from single/multiple image/video feed. Drone/UAV communication and control. Ability to kill the Grasshopper process without killing Rhino. A more powerful Esc-button. Industry leading, robust, fast, native GH, never failing offset/fillet curve. Return of the Lolcats. Javascript component (ok, Python seems nice, but I still miss JS). More exotic DateEx (for those of us driving Mars rovers with GH). Enable/disable components in groups (with bool input?). Data dam controlled by bool input. More file import/export, be it 3d geometry, raster image or other formats. Clothoid curve type. Animated wires when data changes and solution recomputes. "Select orphaned components", that just litter the canvas without contributing to the solution. Minecraft export/import/realtime interaction with server and/or single player map. Smartphone/tablet/web app with automatic remote control panel pairing. Treemaps. All relevant data types and components generalised for n dimensions. GH antivirus (we'll get there eventually). A visual drag-and-drop path mapper. Auto arrange selected components neatly. "Convert curve to wire" for decorative code layouts. Choice to use any bitmap to represent a cluster on the canvas. I realise a lot of it would have to be implemented GH, and not a plugin. Maybe some of the above already exists in the overwhelming fauna of plugins? If so, please tell me. /ola …; Added by Ola Jaensson at 9:39am on May 15, 2014

Comment on: Topic 'Down stand grillage BEF model': go and sulk in the corner, my C# is non existent, although i am making progress on python unfortunately slower than my grasshopper. Attached is a typical relatively simple planar grillage model for a bridge form that is common in Australia/NZ/Asia. The analysis package has a good graphical interface, however i am looking at replicating the process ideally with GH. I am getting there. There are a few constraints in the use of a super T, the precast mould is governed by two critical dimensions: 1. from the beams soffit to the underside of the precast flange, normally Depth -75 or 100mm. Depths that are common are 1200/1500/1800. 2.The real sweet spot dimension is the 1027mm dimension to the outside of the webs, this is a constraint The actual shapes of the prestressed beams are governened by AS5100:5 Appendix H (from memory) In my definition I included the super T cross section which is parametric. The other definition is where I have got to with the grillage. I am a little one dimensional: point-line-surface-volume. I think I am getting to grips with manageing data i lists. My ulimate aim is to: generate basic geometry in gh, the type of analysis will be a space frame or FE, these analysis types require different geometries imported to a structural analysis package ideally utilise IFC, for materials, 2D, 3D drawings and project documentation At the moment I am looking to generate all of my gemetry in GH, that seems to generate a lot of doubled up geometry. Deconstruct Brep may become my favourite. A little excesive is the inclined members spilt into the same no. of points at the grillage length. again thanks for you time, oh! took a a few minutes to work out how to plug your def's in. kenyon …; Added by Kenyon Graham at 7:57pm on December 3, 2015

Topic: I have an idea! But how do I realize it with GH?: g networks". But why should you get to know them and what benefit could they give to your projects? I asked myself these questions several times and postponed some research on i.e. physic systems (Kangaroo), graph networks (Spider Web) or evolutinary solver or other stuff in the past. Because most of the time the answer was the oposite: What kind of knowledge about algorithms, plugins etc. do I need to realize my project? I often had to search for the answers quite long. And if I would have known about some of the above mentioned a bit more detailed, I could have found a solution much faster. Technical terms often make it even more complicated. Surface Relaxation is a common term used for the production of tensile structures? Yeah most Kangaroo users know it, but think of even more difficult things like the one mentioned in the first paragraph! Wouldn't it be nice and useful to have something like an abstract database about what kind of algorithms to use for what kind of projects? I haven't thought so much about how. Maybe it is just a library of technical terms (yeah...the wrong way around), you click on them and see who is doing research on them and with it also an application. These technical terms can then be connected to other terms. A bit like academic work, referring to other papers and also giving advice on where research is missing. If we want to bring algorithmic design forward, it is probably easier having a nice sharing culture. We could maybe find concepts for a use of neural networks or the generation of floorplans or maybe even combine them?!Probably I am a bit naive now and it will be a problem to find a good concept, realize a database and also gather the information on projects, but if you like it, just start thinking and share it. I would like to hear some feedback :-)Greetings,Martin…; Added by Martin D. at 1:26pm on February 1, 2015

Topic: Creating elastic membrane constrained by multiple anchor placed on two different height.(wb&kangaroo needed): nto a wave-like shape. So the shape is determined mostly by the stiffness of the surface and little by gravity. With the help of gh and kangaroo I can drew this prototype to pull two point up and down separately: And here comes a few questions, 1.The outcome is not realistic, and dividing the surface with more meshes doesn't help. How could I make it more natural? 2.The outcome is web-like curves instead of surface/mesh, so is there a way to rewrite the canvas to make the outcome a surface/mesh? 3.Although I can drag one point up/down far or near by varying vector, I can't determine the distance. Is there a way to determined the distance or drag to certain point? 4.Is it possible to drag a surface(eg. a rectangle) instead of a point? Since the section of the column has certain area. Thanks a lot!…; Added by Andersen Jang at 11:58am on November 29, 2015

Topic: New way to publish definition posted in grasshoper forum: r even a geometry. We want to develop open source architecture, and be able to reuse easily open source elements of projects shared by the community. We are interested to display the 3D files in the browser, thanks to connection with external services like http://beta.speckle.xyz or others though at the moment it is not yet available. When I discovered the grasshoper forum, I liked the fact that people talk very openly about their modelling problems and share definition files... But I think Bricks could be a complementary publication mode, to find in a glance an element with all its geometry and a link back to the forum post to join the discussion. Indeed when I work as an architect, I have not always the time to browse a forum with all its discussions to find a suitable element for my project. I've quickly reposted 2-3 forums posts to test it out. I would love to have your feedbacks on this new way of publishing grasshoper definition files and more globally 3d reusable geometries. Here you can see a single definition or the list of definitions that can be classified at the left thanks to custom categories. If you create an account and upload a few definitions and 3d images and files, you could also tell us, what you think of this process. Sébastien www.twitter.com/sebastien_lucas…; Added by Sébastien Lucas at 2:26am on April 8, 2016

Topic: Generate Terrain Not Connecting to OpenTopography Server: ried turning off all firewalls, etc, but still have the issue. I am using your 'analyse_terrain' file. http://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/gismo/forum/topics/terrain-generator-not-finding-the-remote-server The error says: downloadFile_e1: Unable to connect to the remote serverdownloadFile_e2: [Errno socket error] getaddrinfo returns an empty listThis component requires topography data to be downloaded from opentopography.org as a prerequisite for creating a terrain. It has just failed to do that. Try the following two fixes: 1) Sometimes due to large number of requests, the component fails to download the topography data even if opentopography.org website and their services are up and running.In this case, wait a couple of seconds and try reruning the component. 2) opentopography.org website could be up and running, but their terrain service (RESTful Web service) may be down (this already happened before).Try again in a couple of hours. If each of two mentioned advices fails, open a new topic about this issue on: www.grasshopper3d.com/group/gismo/forum. Have you found any other ways to get around this besides shutting off the firewall? Thanks Nate …; Added by Nate Wooten to Gismo at 9:53am on June 8, 2017

Group: GENERATOR (1.0 Method): RHINO OFFICIAL BLOG FOOD4RHINO PROJECT AEC-APPS.COM REVIEW GENERATOR CONCEPT GENERATOR PLUS NUCLEUS RING GENERATOR ORGANICUBE GENERATOR…; Added by Antonio Turiello at 6:02am on August 30, 2012

Comment on: Topic 'Terrain Generator : Invalid Brep': it seems that was this. Now all is working fine ! Glad that it worked! But I am still a bit worried. Gismo components only modify the gdal-data/osmconf.ini file and no other MapWinGIS file. So your MapWinGIS installation files should not be compromised. The fact that you did not get the "COM CLSID" error message when running the "Gismo Gismo" component suggests that MapWinGIS has been properly installed. So I wonder if the cause for the permanent "invalid shapes" warning has again something with the fact that your system is again not allowing the MapWinGIS to properly edit the osmconf.ini. Maybe this problem will appear again, and again, and reinstallation of MapWinGIS every time can be somewhat bothersome. - About the terrain generation, is it possible to have the texture from google or other provider mapped onto the terrain surface from gismo component ? (Same as using the ladybug terrain generator in fact). I try to used the image extracted by ladybug component and then applied it to the gismo terrain but the texture is rotated by 90°. The issue with the rotation can be solved by swapping/reversing the U,V directions of the terrain surface. A slightly more important issue is that terrain surface generated with Gismo "Terrain Generator" component might have a bit smaller radius than what the radius_ input required. This stems from the fact that the terrain data first needs to be downloaded in geographic coordinate system, and then projected. Some projecting issues may occur at the very edges of the projected terrain, so I had to slightly cut out the very edges of the terrain which results in the actual terrain diameters being slightly shorted in both directions. This means that if you apply the same satellite image from Ladybug "Terrain Generator" component to Gismo "Terrain Generator" component the results may not be the same.I attached below a python component which tries to solve this issue by extending the edges of Gismo "Terrain Generator" terrain, and then cutting them with the cuboid of the exact dimensions as the radius_ input. Have in mind that this extension of the original terrain at its edges is not a correct representation of the actual terrain in that location. But rather just an extension of the isoparameteric curve of the terrain surface. So basically: some 0 to 10% (0 to 10 percent of the width and length) of the terrain around all four edges is not the actual terrain for that location, but rather just its extension.The python component is located at the very right of the definition attached below. Also, if you would like to use the satellite images from Ladybug "Terrain Generator" component along with "OSM shapes", sometimes you may find slight differences in position of the shapes. This is due to openstreetmap data not being based on Google Maps (that's what Ladybug "Terrain Generator" component is using), but rather on Bing, MapQuest and a few others. - About the requiredKeys_ input of OSM shapes, I understand what you mean and your advice, but in most cases I use it, the component was working fine even without input. I think it's better to extract all tags, values and keys of the selected area, instead of searching for specific ones as I try to find all data related to what I want after, isn't it ? To check what keys are present on the area also. Ineed, you are correct.I though you were trying to only create a terrain, 3d buildings and maybe find some school or similar 3d building, for these two locations. The recommendation I mentioned previously is due to shapefiles having a limit (2044) to how many keys it can contain. This requires further testing of some big cities locations with maybe larger radii, which I haven't performed due to my poor PC configuration. But in theory, I imagine that it may happen that a downloaded .osm file may have more than 2044 keys. In that case shapefile will only record 2044 of them, and disregard the others. That was my point.But again 2044 is a lot of keys, and I haven't been checking much this in practice. For example, when I set the radius_ to 1000 meters, and use your "3 Rue de Bretonvilliers Paris" location I get around 350 something keys, which is way below the 2044.Another reason why one should use the requiredKeys_ input is to make the Gismo OSM components run quicker: for example, the upper mentioned 350 something keys will result in 350 values for each branch of the "OSM shapes" component's "values" output.Which means if you have 10 000 shapes, the "OSM shapes" component will have 10 000 branches with 350 items on each branch (values). This can make all Gismo OSM components very heavy, and significantly elongate the calculation process.With requiredKeys_ input you may end up with only a couple of tens of items per each branch.Sorry for the long reply.…; Added by djordje to Gismo at 8:57am on June 11, 2017

Topic: gHowl r46 available for download: ng stage. This release fixes a few issues and adds some functionality not found in previous versions. We have included examples for various applications. If you have any questions or have issues using the gHowl components, please let us know. Please remember to have Open Office installed for the spreadsheet components. *** Tested with GH 0.7.0057. Reports show that gHowl does not appear for GH 0.7.0055. We will sort out a compatible version for 0.7.x with the latest release. Works well with 0.8.0001.***Components:UDP:UDP Components now have the ability to send and receive to a Multicast group. To send or receive to a Multicast group, make sure you use the IP Range of 224.0.0.0 - 239.255.255.255.OSC functionality is provided by the Bespoke OSC Library by Paul Varcholik.Network Source - Tests the connection of your machine to a network. UDP Send - Allows the sending of UDP messages over the network. Also allows the sending of OSC messages to OSC enabled software and hardware devices. (Deleting this component in 0.7.0057 crashes GH / Rhino) UDP Receive - Allows the sending and receiving of UDP messages. Also allows the reception of OSC messages and bundles (from Reactivision for example).(Deleting this component in 0.7.0057 crashes GH / Rhino) OSC Channel - This component allows the storage of a single OSC Channel. Change the component's nickname to store that address' data. OSC Dispatch - This component allows the storage of data from multiple OSC addresses.Spreadsheet: The spreadsheet components leverage the Open Office Calc engine. You must have Open Office Calc installed in order for these components to work. These components read and write *.ods, *.xls, and *.xlsx files. Supports numerical values and strings. AppChecker - Checks to see whether Open Office Calc or Excel are installed on your computer. Spreadsheet In - Retrieves spreadsheet data from a file stored on your computer. (Deleting this component after referencing a file in 0.7.0057 crashes GH / Rhino) Spreadsheet Out - Allows you to write a spreadsheet file. (Deleting this component after writing a file in 0.7.0057 crashes GH / Rhino)XML:These components retrieve xml data from local and web sources (such as RSS feeds). Pachube - Retrieves data from a Pachube feed. Must have a valid Pachube API. (Deleting this component after making a connection in 0.7.0057 crashes GH / Rhino) XML Parser - This component parses an XML file stored on your computer or on the web.Thanks! The gHowl Team...…; Added by Luis Fraguada to gHowl at 9:52am on October 24, 2010

Blog Post: Geometries Specialist (m/f/d) @ Studio Olafur Eliasson: Job Description:

As geometries specialist, you will work in the small and dynamic team for advanced geometries at Studio Olafur Eliasson. This team operates within the…; Added by Dorothea Hendrichs at 1:47am on February 27, 2019