Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Hello everyone, 

I am seeking your general advice in terms of using Galapagos/Octopus. I do not know whether it is the display issue associated with my computer only, I always start with blank interface when I start running Galapagos/Octopus (below is "room orientation optimization" shared at  http://hydrashare.github.io/hydra/viewer?owner=mostaphaRoudsari&...It may take quite some time to see some results. That's fine for the above simulation. But my real challenge is, when I am going to optimize room dimension with respect to ASE and sDA calculations, either Galapagos or Octopus goes wildly and never come up with a solution. I believe the time-consuming calculation, especially sDA with higher -ab numbers, trigger the lag a lot? Any suggestion/trick to improve it? 

Most importantly, based on your experience, for example to optimize window/exterior shades sizes and achieve ASE<10% and sDA>55% (LEED v.4 requirements), Octopus (due to its capacity of multiple objectives) is the only choice? Any other approaches within grasshopper? 

The alternative approach in my mind as a GH beginner is as follows. But I am not sure whether it is doable. Again, your comments will be greatly appreciated. 

Since all my room/window/shades dimension are controlled by number sliders, I am thinking whether a component from GH will trigger these number sliders (not necessary to be all of them but one by one) automatically. If this is possible, I can do "data recorder" to record outputs from ASE and sDA. Eventually I will have a database of the input parameters and sDA/ASE results.

Does it make sense?  Is there a component which can trigger number slider output at certain step?     

Many thank! 

Cheney 

Views: 646

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Have you tried the KB_Fly?

-A.

What Abraham said and then use DesignExplorer to visualize the results.

You guys are awesome, now I see an alternative approach! 

I was just wondering.. What's KB_Fly? I couldn't find info on it.

Should be LB_Fly. Look at group 4 (Extra) in LB.

-A.

Thank you, guys! I am testing LB_Fly now. DesignExplorer is also a very good suggestion. I used it for Designbuiler optimization analysis before. It will be a good tool to select my target combinations. Hopefully the approach could replace Octopus in my calculation.   

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service