Grasshopper2024-03-30T06:01:19ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYeziorohttps://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2791264445?profile=RESIZE_48X48&width=48&height=48&crop=1%3A1https://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/ladybug/forum/topic/listForContributor?groupUrl=ladybug&user=0fflzonpod95k&feed=yes&xn_auth=noTilt (X-axis) vs energy (Y-axis) charttag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2021-01-06:2985220:Topic:21347652021-01-06T19:29:38.823ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Could anyone please tell me how can I get the data for solar tilt vs the energy? I want to see for each angle how much will the energy be.</p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Could anyone please tell me how can I get the data for solar tilt vs the energy? I want to see for each angle how much will the energy be.</p>
<p>Best Regards</p> ANALYSIS PERIOD ON ENERGYPUS 0.0.64 is not working properlytag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2019-11-24:2985220:Topic:20265792019-11-24T15:24:58.368ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hi everybody,</p>
<p>I just noticed that using LadyBug Analysis Period on Energy Plus component (r. 0.0.64) is not working properly.</p>
<p>Reducing hours period it gives back always the same annual values.</p>
<p>Combining hours, days and/or months periods it gives back not reliable values, and in some reader components such as LadyBug Average Data it failed it reporting this warning: solution exception: index out of range 0.</p>
<p>Setting inputs for all the year everything is…</p>
<p>Hi everybody,</p>
<p>I just noticed that using LadyBug Analysis Period on Energy Plus component (r. 0.0.64) is not working properly.</p>
<p>Reducing hours period it gives back always the same annual values.</p>
<p>Combining hours, days and/or months periods it gives back not reliable values, and in some reader components such as LadyBug Average Data it failed it reporting this warning: solution exception: index out of range 0.</p>
<p>Setting inputs for all the year everything is fine!</p>
<p>I'm trying to understand the reason but i don't see any major error in my program.</p>
<p>Does anybody get the possible reason?</p> Issue with Ladybug Sunlight hours analysistag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2019-06-17:2985220:Topic:19937332019-06-17T15:44:16.401ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hi,<br></br>I have not been using Ladybug tools in a bit, and as such I may be a but rusty.</p>
<p>I have adapted Mostapha's example for Shadow Range analysis available on <a href="http://hydrashare.github.io/hydra/viewer?owner=mostaphaRoudsari&fork=hydra_1&id=Shadow_Range_analysis&slide=0&scale=1&offset=0,0" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Hydra</a>. and the image below is what I get. I am happy to have an indication of the number of hours that the open areas receive on a day…</p>
<p>Hi,<br/>I have not been using Ladybug tools in a bit, and as such I may be a but rusty.</p>
<p>I have adapted Mostapha's example for Shadow Range analysis available on <a href="http://hydrashare.github.io/hydra/viewer?owner=mostaphaRoudsari&fork=hydra_1&id=Shadow_Range_analysis&slide=0&scale=1&offset=0,0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hydra</a>. and the image below is what I get. I am happy to have an indication of the number of hours that the open areas receive on a day (in this case, the 21st March, in line with BRE guidance for the UK).</p>
<p></p>
<p>Why is the workflow working for one surface only?</p>
<p></p>
<p><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2976558838?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2976558838?profile=RESIZE_710x" class="align-full"/></a></p> Selecting Individual Simulation Analysis Grid (Mesh)tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2019-02-10:2985220:Topic:19620542019-02-10T03:00:52.434ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hi Everyone, </p>
<p>I am working on daylight and solar exposure analysis with ladybug and honeybee, and i have two questions:</p>
<p>1- Is there a way that i can select each panel from the simulation result (analysis mesh) individually as surface and sort it based on the result value presented by the simulation result? I want to treat each grid (surface) differently.</p>
<p>2- how I can present the value text tag on each grid to be aligned with the geometry surface instead of Z direction…</p>
<p>Hi Everyone, </p>
<p>I am working on daylight and solar exposure analysis with ladybug and honeybee, and i have two questions:</p>
<p>1- Is there a way that i can select each panel from the simulation result (analysis mesh) individually as surface and sort it based on the result value presented by the simulation result? I want to treat each grid (surface) differently.</p>
<p>2- how I can present the value text tag on each grid to be aligned with the geometry surface instead of Z direction projection?</p>
<p></p>
<p><a href="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/1016312525?profile=original" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/1016312525?profile=RESIZE_710x" class="align-center"/></a></p> AirWalls Energy Simulation using Open Studiotag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2019-01-07:2985220:Topic:19548702019-01-07T16:53:32.254ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hello everyone!</p>
<p></p>
<p>I have looked the diretories and I wonder if you are still answering the doubts that come up from users, because all the discussions seens to be from 2016 rs.</p>
<p>I have an issue. I need to set the ceilings as airwalls, and I have done that through the solve adjacencies component. However, the simulation only works when I use the Run Energy Simualtion component. I am using conditioned zones as well, and I need to use the Open StudiO Component, but the…</p>
<p>Hello everyone!</p>
<p></p>
<p>I have looked the diretories and I wonder if you are still answering the doubts that come up from users, because all the discussions seens to be from 2016 rs.</p>
<p>I have an issue. I need to set the ceilings as airwalls, and I have done that through the solve adjacencies component. However, the simulation only works when I use the Run Energy Simualtion component. I am using conditioned zones as well, and I need to use the Open StudiO Component, but the ceilings as airwalls doesn't work when I run the simulation with Open Studio. I really need help with that. Does anyone have the same problem? Any ideas how to fix this?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Hope anyone have an answer for that :)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thank you!</p> Can Honeybee generate angular fisheye?tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2018-10-19:2985220:Topic:19395032018-10-19T05:52:06.179ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hi</p>
<p>I have a quick questions.</p>
<p>Is there any options to generate an angular fisheye view rather than hemispherical in honeybee.</p>
<p>The camera type for image based simulation seems to have [1]perspective, [2]fisheye and [3]parallel, but the fisheye is set to hemispherical by default (correct me if I am wrong.)</p>
<p>Is there any way to change it?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks in advance!!</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Hi</p>
<p>I have a quick questions.</p>
<p>Is there any options to generate an angular fisheye view rather than hemispherical in honeybee.</p>
<p>The camera type for image based simulation seems to have [1]perspective, [2]fisheye and [3]parallel, but the fisheye is set to hemispherical by default (correct me if I am wrong.)</p>
<p>Is there any way to change it?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks in advance!!</p>
<p></p>
<p></p> Honeybee-Sloped Facade Glazingtag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2018-09-17:2985220:Topic:19312162018-09-17T11:39:30.343ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hi everyone, </p>
<p></p>
<p>I am currently working on a project to execute illumination analysis for an office unit. But i have a problem to define glazing on sloped surface. </p>
<p></p>
<p>To explain better, I have compared surfaces that i am dealing with. I am working on a sloping glazing facade. I guess due to complex geometry, energyplus does not recognize surface as a glazing surface, though it represents as wall. I am using Honeybee plug-in to execute daylight…</p>
<p>Hi everyone, </p>
<p></p>
<p>I am currently working on a project to execute illumination analysis for an office unit. But i have a problem to define glazing on sloped surface. </p>
<p></p>
<p>To explain better, I have compared surfaces that i am dealing with. I am working on a sloping glazing facade. I guess due to complex geometry, energyplus does not recognize surface as a glazing surface, though it represents as wall. I am using Honeybee plug-in to execute daylight analysis. </p>
<p></p>
<p>Could someone help me to solve it, or you can offer an alternative solution.</p>
<p></p>
<p>In attached files, you can see screen shots of units, in addition, i added gh. file of model.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Orçun Koral İşeri</p> Simulated daylighting illuminance problem in Honeybeetag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2018-03-30:2985220:Topic:18990572018-03-30T16:39:09.732ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
Dear All,<br />
<br />
I am doing a daylighting simulation and compared with measured illuminance data. In my Honeybee+Radiance simulation results,I found that the positions with 4 meters away from the walls have the highest illuminance and the positions with 2 meters away from walls have very low illuminance values. But in the real measured conditions, I found the 2 meters away positions have the largest illuminance. I found this is very weird.<br />
I set the ceiling reflectance as 0.8, wall as 0.6, floor as…
Dear All,<br />
<br />
I am doing a daylighting simulation and compared with measured illuminance data. In my Honeybee+Radiance simulation results,I found that the positions with 4 meters away from the walls have the highest illuminance and the positions with 2 meters away from walls have very low illuminance values. But in the real measured conditions, I found the 2 meters away positions have the largest illuminance. I found this is very weird.<br />
I set the ceiling reflectance as 0.8, wall as 0.6, floor as 0.3, column and ceiling as 0.6, outdoor ground as 0.2. Bounce -ab as 4, and all other kept as the default.<br />
<br />
Does anyone know what could be the reasons?<br />
<br />
Thanks a lot.<br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
<br />
David which version for Version 0.9.0076tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2018-02-27:2985220:Topic:18892912018-02-27T11:25:38.320ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>hi there,</p>
<p></p>
<p>which one is the latest for my gh version.</p>
<p>also i have removed my old verions of ladybug /honeybee but still there is a component showing up. </p>
<p></p>
<p>have used this</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/how-to-remove-ladybug-and-honeybee">http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/how-to-remove-ladybug-and-honeybee</a></p>
<p>but was compiled in a newer version so it doesnt work.</p>
<p></p>
<p>thanks !</p>
<p>hi there,</p>
<p></p>
<p>which one is the latest for my gh version.</p>
<p>also i have removed my old verions of ladybug /honeybee but still there is a component showing up. </p>
<p></p>
<p>have used this</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/how-to-remove-ladybug-and-honeybee">http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/how-to-remove-ladybug-and-honeybee</a></p>
<p>but was compiled in a newer version so it doesnt work.</p>
<p></p>
<p>thanks !</p> AddHBglz problemtag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2018-02-26:2985220:Topic:18892442018-02-26T20:24:15.780ZAbraham Yeziorohttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AbrahamYezioro
<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I am doing an energy simulation on a simple case. I am trying to use the component addHBglz but it doesn't work even though I followed step by step the youtube video by Chris Mackey. I had the same problem in the past, but in addition this time I have also some problems running the simulation with energy plus and open studio.</p>
<p>I will attach 2 files with the examples for clarification.</p>
<p>Could you please help me solving these problems?</p>
<p>Thank you for you work…</p>
<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I am doing an energy simulation on a simple case. I am trying to use the component addHBglz but it doesn't work even though I followed step by step the youtube video by Chris Mackey. I had the same problem in the past, but in addition this time I have also some problems running the simulation with energy plus and open studio.</p>
<p>I will attach 2 files with the examples for clarification.</p>
<p>Could you please help me solving these problems?</p>
<p>Thank you for you work and help guys!</p>
<p>Carlotta</p>