Grasshopper 0.9.0055 available for download - Grasshopper2024-03-28T18:58:32Zhttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/grasshopper-0-9-0055-available-for-download?amp%3BcommentId=2985220%3AComment%3A881485&%3Bx=1&feed=yes&xn_auth=noYou need a newer Rhino5. The…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-07-04:2985220:Comment:8814852013-07-04T08:53:20.813ZDavid Ruttenhttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/DavidRutten
<p>You need a newer Rhino5. The earlier versions had bugs in the Installer Engine.</p>
<p></p>
<p>--</p>
<p>David Rutten</p>
<p>david@mcneel.com</p>
<p>Tirol, Austria</p>
<p>You need a newer Rhino5. The earlier versions had bugs in the Installer Engine.</p>
<p></p>
<p>--</p>
<p>David Rutten</p>
<p>david@mcneel.com</p>
<p>Tirol, Austria</p> I have the same message on Rh…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-07-04:2985220:Comment:8813752013-07-04T08:40:53.377ZCarol Johnsonhttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/CarolJohnson
<p>I have the same message on Rhino 5 when I try to install Grasshopper .9.0056. I previously had Grasshopper .9.0014 installed. I uninstalled it before trying to load .9.0056.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Did anyone solve this issue?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Carol</p>
<p>I have the same message on Rhino 5 when I try to install Grasshopper .9.0056. I previously had Grasshopper .9.0014 installed. I uninstalled it before trying to load .9.0056.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Did anyone solve this issue?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Carol</p> Reversing a list consumes res…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-06-20:2985220:Comment:8750372013-06-20T00:55:28.026ZVicente Solerhttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/VicenteSoler
<p>Reversing a list consumes resources. If you just want to retrieve the last item using index -1 is more efficient.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>When you say you use false the majority of times, you mean that in the majority of the cases you use a component with a wrapping input if you set it as true it will fail?</p>
<p>Reversing a list consumes resources. If you just want to retrieve the last item using index -1 is more efficient.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>When you say you use false the majority of times, you mean that in the majority of the cases you use a component with a wrapping input if you set it as true it will fail?</p> Flex your wrapping muscles!…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-06-19:2985220:Comment:8750272013-06-19T23:53:44.102ZMarc Syphttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/MarcSyp
<p></p>
<p>Flex your wrapping muscles! There's a whole world out there for you to explore! :)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Flex your wrapping muscles! There's a whole world out there for you to explore! :)</p> Incidentally, for last item I…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-06-19:2985220:Comment:8750222013-06-19T23:47:28.363ZMarc Syphttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/MarcSyp
<p>Incidentally, for last item I've always used List Item with default index set to 0 and a reverse list modifier on the list input. Super quick, and easy to explain to beginners.</p>
<p></p>
<p>I use T for several operations, but the majority is F for me as well. The topology of things that I work with is rarely periodic. Curtain walls, structural grids, test grids, analysis vectos, modules, etc, they tend to be arrayed in groups with finite beginnings and endings. That makes wrapping…</p>
<p>Incidentally, for last item I've always used List Item with default index set to 0 and a reverse list modifier on the list input. Super quick, and easy to explain to beginners.</p>
<p></p>
<p>I use T for several operations, but the majority is F for me as well. The topology of things that I work with is rarely periodic. Curtain walls, structural grids, test grids, analysis vectos, modules, etc, they tend to be arrayed in groups with finite beginnings and endings. That makes wrapping very rare. </p>
<p></p>
<p>I think conforming to the use case for finding the last number in a list is too narrowly defining the use of that component, especially when the simple task is easily accomplished in another rational and efficient way...</p> so how did you solve this iss…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-05-23:2985220:Comment:8590412013-05-23T06:37:08.898ZPhilipphttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/Philipp
<p>so how did you solve this issue, eduardo?</p>
<p>so how did you solve this issue, eduardo?</p> you could consider making pop…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-05-17:2985220:Comment:8546922013-05-17T11:36:44.198Zgotjoshhttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/gotjosh
<p>you could consider making pop and unshift fxs that do the traditional array operations...</p>
<p>you could consider making pop and unshift fxs that do the traditional array operations...</p> interesting, never used negat…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-05-16:2985220:Comment:8548172013-05-16T23:49:25.321ZSteve Lewishttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/TrevorStephenLewis
<p>interesting, never used negative shift values, typically i revers the input list, shift, then reverse output list</p>
<p>interesting, never used negative shift values, typically i revers the input list, shift, then reverse output list</p> I admit logic wants true to b…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-05-16:2985220:Comment:8545612013-05-16T19:03:51.490ZAlessandro Ronfinihttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/AlessandroRonfini
<p>I admit logic wants true to be the default... </p>
<p>And I agree an unpredictable result will not be fun, so it's easier to get used to the new default!</p>
<p></p>
<p>I admit logic wants true to be the default... </p>
<p>And I agree an unpredictable result will not be fun, so it's easier to get used to the new default!</p>
<p></p> I think this would be confusi…tag:www.grasshopper3d.com,2013-05-16:2985220:Comment:8544822013-05-16T18:56:41.939ZVicente Solerhttps://www.grasshopper3d.com/profile/VicenteSoler
<p>I think this would be confusing, not knowing the default when sharing definitions, screenshots and so on.</p>
<p>I would leave true as default (well, if I got my way the warp inputs would be removed altogether) and to strip off the end values use something like cull index, split list, sub-list, etc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The replace items component still has the default as false.</p>
<p>also, split list component doesn't support wrapping.</p>
<p>I think this would be confusing, not knowing the default when sharing definitions, screenshots and so on.</p>
<p>I would leave true as default (well, if I got my way the warp inputs would be removed altogether) and to strip off the end values use something like cull index, split list, sub-list, etc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The replace items component still has the default as false.</p>
<p>also, split list component doesn't support wrapping.</p>