Search Results in David Rutten's Discussions (13,798)

Discussions	Replies	Latest Activity
"Hi Gui, you're not doing anything wrong. The Boundary component does not retain lis…" David Rutten replied Apr 24, 2014 to List order of boundary surfaces	3	Apr 24, 2014 Reply by Gui Talarico
" Cool huh? -- David Rutten david@mcneel.com" David Rutten replied Apr 24, 2014 to help me bend of a flat shape following a certain radius	13	Apr 25, 2014 Reply by David Rutten
"At any rate, you now always get a valid arc, even though the arc properties are chan…" David Rutten replied Apr 25, 2014 to help me bend of a flat shape following a certain radius	13	Apr 25, 2014 Reply by David Rutten
"Yeah the Arc needs fixin' I'll make sure that angle domains are handled properly in…" David Rutten replied Apr 25, 2014 to help me bend of a flat shape following a certain radius	13	Apr 25, 2014 Reply by David Rutten
"It's a bit weird. The only way I can seem to fix this properly means the resulting a…" David Rutten replied Apr 25, 2014 to help me bend of a flat shape following a certain radius	13	Apr 25, 2014 Reply by David Rutten
"I do not know how the UV directions are computed for the Boundary component (or the…" David Rutten replied Apr 25, 2014 to how does the Boundary Surfaces component choose the UV directions?	2	Apr 25, 2014 Reply by Andrei Raducanu
"A closed polyline has coincident first and last points. Try removing the last point…" David Rutten replied Apr 26, 2014 to Curvethroughpolyline	2	Apr 26, 2014 Reply by David Rutten
"It could be the deform component is not really going to solve your problem. I attach…" David Rutten replied Apr 26, 2014 to 2 Spacial Deform questions	2	Apr 26, 2014 Reply by Declan Halpin
"Another possible approach is to use SubList and then provide overlapping index domai…" David Rutten replied Apr 27, 2014 to List management issue	4	Apr 27, 2014 Reply by Anton Bakker
"Use 'x' instead of the parameter name. -- David Rutten david@mcneel.com" David Rutten replied Apr 27, 2014 to expression problem	2	Apr 27, 2014 Reply by G.Y.