algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Search Results in Evert Amador's Discussions (208)

Discussions	Replies	Latest Activity
"Hi David, It would be handy if you could add this. Many thanks. Evert" Evert Amador replied May 16, 2011 to WISH - Increase slider max/min while typing a new value	0	May 16, 2011
"Hello!, What it says on the tin! More can be found here cheers! Evert" Evert Amador replied Mar 27, 2012 to Hexagonal Mapping using box morph example!	2	Mar 24, 2017 Reply by Nick Bruscia
"Hello! I'm working my way though creating a component and I'm stuck on passing the r…" Evert Amador replied Oct 28, 2012 to Registering input parameters and passing the to SolveInstance	12	Jan 11, 2013 Reply by Daniel Bosia
"Hello! Sometime ago I put together a CSharp component to generate hexagon cells on a…" Evert Amador replied Oct 31, 2012 to Hexagrid on surface component	2	Oct 31, 2012 Reply by Dedackelzucht
"Dear All, I found and old post for this but this was posted when there were no dat…" Evert Amador replied Oct 28, 2010 to CSharp how to output data tree structures?	10	Nov 2, 2010 Reply by Evert Amador
"Hi Shankar, This page may be of help! http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TangentCircles.…" Evert Amador replied May 18, 2009 to Circle Packing!	3	May 20, 2009 Reply by shankar kothapuram
"Hi Federico, As To] suggested, it should be possible to create some sort of genetic…" Evert Amador replied Jun 29, 2009 to Emergent system in Grasshopper?	3	Jun 29, 2009 Reply by Phil Davis
"Hi Roberto, I saw your post this morning on the Rhino NewsGroup. Sorry I've haven'…" Evert Amador replied Aug 26, 2009 to delaunay meshes from (poli)surfaces	18	Aug 28, 2009 Reply by roberto gagliano
"Hello! I haven't tried it yet. Have a look at this page for rhino membrane and pric…" Evert Amador replied Aug 26, 2009 to delaunay meshes from (poli)surfaces	18	Aug 28, 2009 Reply by roberto gagliano
"Hi Vicente, Very interesting, could you post the definition? Regards Evert" Evert Amador replied Aug 27, 2009 to delaunay meshes from (poli)surfaces	18	Aug 28, 2009 Reply by roberto gagliano