Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Not so much a bug as an inconsistency. Currently the cull pattern and cull mesh face components pattern inputs do the inverse culling of each other (true = remove in one but keep in the other). Is it intended for some reason?  

Views: 1633

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

Is it intended for some reason? 

Probably not. There's a lot of inconsistencies in GH1, mostly due to the organic nature in which the project was developed and the absence of any proofing procedures.

Ah, thanks for the response David. Just wasn't sure if there was some logic for cull mesh face to be inverted because actually for the example above having it be inverted worked out for me (meaning I didn't have to set it to be inverted). Looking forward to GH2!

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service