algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Vorticular Decay Sphere
The idea for this model was to try and create a bit more tectonic mass into the previous 'decay' models. The were too blobby and static, they looked too devoid of forces, too digital. So i experimented with different vortices to apply a bit more purpose into the object.
---
The inside of the structure is far more successful than the outside. The general direction and dynamic of it feels far more natural and intentional, but without losing its mass.
More images in comments below.
www.tyrertecture.com
Comment
-
Comment by David Stasiuk on July 29, 2015 at 9:15am
-
Beautiful. I love the directionality of it! Are you isosurfacing with Millipede?
-
Comment by Nick Tyrer on July 29, 2015 at 8:50am
-
3D systems projet 660pro, beast of a machine, and using a tiny air hose is very satisfying.
The lack of scaffold is fantastic, i definitely do not miss hours with scalpel trying to dig scaffold out of unreachable corners of a print.
-
Comment by Martin Siegrist on July 29, 2015 at 8:02am
-
Interesting, Nick!
-
Comment by taz on July 29, 2015 at 7:32am
-
Z corp style... baller!
-
Comment by martyn hogg on July 29, 2015 at 7:16am
-
ah a 3d systems printer?
the result looks good and not needing support / scaffold has got to be a good thing!
-
-
Haha thanks man. No, our printer is a powder based printer, that uses inkjet heads and binder.
Pro's: No scaffold, high fidelity, can print in colour.
Con's: Needs to be post processed with industrial strength glue, slightly rough finish (like sandstone)
-
-
is this laser sintered or SLA or...?
Looks amazing, but not the best ashtray design I've seen :)
-
-
-
-
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
About
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Translate
Search
Photos
Videos
-
Scaling Tower
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
-
Field Trap
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
-
Subd Bridge
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Grasshopper to add comments!