Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Information

Karamba3D

Karamba3D is a parametric structural engineering tool which provides accurate analysis of spatial trusses, frames and shells.

Current Version: 1.3.2 (July 9 2019)

Website: http://www.karamba3d.com
Location: Vienna
Members: 1115
Latest Activity: Mar 20

Karamba3D is an interactive, parametric finite element program. It lets you analyze the response of 3-dimensional beam and shell structures under arbitrary loads.

Karamba3D is being developed by Clemens Preisinger in cooperation with Bollinger und Grohmann ZTGmbH in Vienna.

Download a free trial now! Licenses for educational or commercial purposes can be purchased at www.karamba3d.com/buy.

downloads, manual:

https://manual.karamba3d.com/ or

www.food4rhino.com/app/karamba3d

examples (for Karamba3D 1.3.2):

www.karamba3d.com/examples/

release notes: 
www.grasshopper3d.com/group/karamba3d/page/new-features-and-bug-fixes

scripting guide & examples:

https://www.karamba3d.com/download/#manual

repository with unit tests:

https://github.com/karamba3d/K3D_tests

Here a beam structure based on stream-lines with bending moments:


 

More details, manual, examples and download ....

 

This grasshopper discussion forum is no longer maintained - please post all questions on the McNeel Forum. Thank you

 

Discussion Forum

How to make a program and analysis? 7 Replies

Hello:I want to know how to make a program and analysis the structure of shell waffle welding with the steel plate.I want to create the load for the steel plate(6 mm thickness) welding with the steel…Continue

Tags: Karamba

Started by ma qingsong. Last reply by Terry Austin Mar 20.

How to define 3D Objects in Karamba 6 Replies

Hello. I have a problem in defining 3D Objects in Karamba. What I am trying to do, is that I have 3D scanned a few Irregular stones. So I have their 3D meshes in grasshopper. Then I am trying to…Continue

Tags: #irregular_object, #stones, #structural_analysis, #Karamba3D

Started by Amir Arsalan Tahouni. Last reply by Hison Feb 28.

Exploring the World of High-Quality Audio: A Guide to Selecting the Best Sound Systems for Your Needs

In our sonic odyssey, selecting the right audio system becomes paramount. It's not merely about amplifying sound; it's about curating an environment where every note, every chord, and every beat…Continue

Started by Alice Billson Feb 27.

Comparing Shaving Products Across the Market: Finding Your Fit

In the vast landscape of shaving products available today, finding the perfect fit can feel like navigating a maze. From sleek razors to luxurious creams, the choices are endless. However, amidst…Continue

Started by Alice Billson Feb 27.

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Karamba3D to add comments!

Comment by Karamba3D on April 15, 2015 at 12:03am

Elisa, you could try to place two elements in the same spot. One with, one without eccentricity and add corresponding loads to them.

Best, C.

Comment by Elisa Cheung on April 14, 2015 at 3:27pm

Clemens,

Thanks for your response. However, I'm still having trouble with the ecce-loc. I want to change ONLY the eccentricity of the prestress load , and not offset the other uniform loads. Is there a way to do that?

Comment by Karamba3D on April 13, 2015 at 11:45pm

Hi Elisa,

in Karamba 1.1.0 the post-tension load is attached to the eccentric beam element (see PreTensionLoad_EccentricBeam.gh).

The trapezoid cross section is filled (when rendered it looks hollow though). The box cross section is hollow.

Best,

Clemens

Comment by Elisa Cheung on April 13, 2015 at 6:33pm

Hey guys, I'm having two issues.

Is there any way to change the eccentricity of the post-tension load? I changed the ecce-loc input but that only changes the centroid of where the point load acts -- the post-tension load seems to be unaffected.

2. How do I get a filled trapezoid cross section? It appears to be hollow at the moment. 

Thanks for your help in advance!

Comment by Nicholas Rawitscher on March 31, 2015 at 11:58am

Hey guys! do you know where to find the "point-load" component in the latest version of Karamba? thank you for your help

Comment by Karamba3D on January 8, 2015 at 11:14pm

Leonardo:

in Karamba 1.0.5 the cross section optimization algorithm only considers normal forces for buckling. The next version (Karamba 1.1.0) takes full account of the EC3 formulas including lateral torsional buckling and interaction values according to annex B.

Best,

Clemens

Comment by Leonardo on January 8, 2015 at 3:53pm

Clemens, thanks for your quick answer.

I have carefully read the appendix and the way for calculating the buckling length is clear. However I have still one questions:

seems to be that adopting Eurocode3 (eq. 6.47) only the normal forces are compared with the critical buckling load. Am I right?

Can we want take into account both, bending and axial compression, as suggested by Eurocode3 (Eq. 6.3.3)? 

Many thanks,

Leonardo

Comment by Karamba3D on January 7, 2015 at 11:02pm

Hi Leonardo,

the Cross Section Optimization component takes into account buckling for members (see the appendix of the Karamba manual). The assumed buckling length is the distance between two nodes that connect to more than three beams or to a support or double that distance in case one end is free. The buckling lengths can be set manually via the 'ModifyBeam'-component.
If you have 'huge' bending moments in your structure then buckling will have little effect on the result. 

Sometimes so called global buckling can govern a design (think e.g. of a compressed girder of a truss structure). In such cases one has to guess the buckling length or do a buckling analysis (which will be possible in Karamba 1.1.0). 

Best,

Clemens

Comment by Leonardo on January 7, 2015 at 3:56pm

Hi Clemens,

I need your help! I have a very simple curved geometry, like an arch, composed by several beams. This is a not funicular geometry and there are huge bending moments. I do not understand:

1) if the Cross Section Optimization component takes into account buckling for members in bending and axial compression (6.3.3 - Eurocode 3).  

2) if the buckling length corresponds to each beam or to the length of the whole arch or to the distance between supports (local or global buckling.

If instead of an arch, there is a more complex structure, i.e. an arch bridge with tendons and deck, what is the buckling length of the arch adopted by the Cross Section Optimization component?

Many thanks,

Leonardo

Comment by Llordella Patricio on October 22, 2014 at 12:40pm

Dear clemens

Thanks for the help, I just created a topic discussion and add any comments that we have done so far.

Best regards

Patricio

 

Members (1115)

 
 
 

About

Translate

Search

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service