kiara's Page

Dedackelzucht replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"And thats why it is limited to 8 numbers. I think I got it. Thanks Danny!"

Sep 2, 2011

Danny Boyes replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"To convert a decimal number to binary you divide it by 2 and keep going until you get to zero making a note of the remainder as you go. 157 \ 2 = 78 remainder 1 78 \ 2 = 39 remainder 0 39 \ 2 = 19 remainder 1 19 \ 2 = 9…"

Sep 2, 2011

Dedackelzucht replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"very cool danny, i just do not get it how the cluster works. I oen it and treid to understand, but I didin´t. Best Regards Dedackel"

Sep 2, 2011

Danny Boyes replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"Here's a method that needs a Binary sequence to work. for example: 000 = (0*6)+(0*5)+(0*1) = 0 001 = (0*6)+(0*5)+(1*1) = 1 010 = (0*6)+(1*5)+(0*1) = 5 011 = (0*6)+(1*5)+(1*1) = 6 100 = (1*6)+(0*5)+(0*1) = 6 101 =…"

Sep 2, 2011

marshall prado replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"I am working on something similar with numbers where I am trying to find all possible summations of 5 numbers without "duplicates". for example: (If I used three numbers instead for simplicity) 1, 5, 6 would…"

Sep 1, 2011

kiara replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"the attachment"

Aug 12, 2011

kiara replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"thanks for the reply David!! I added the Substring component at the end so it can work on multiple characters. Both suggestions are very useful in order to choose whether we want either "n!" solutions (6 arrangements…"

Aug 12, 2011

David Rutten replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"This sounds like a job for Bicycle Repair Man. This will be quite tricky to achieve, especially if you have a large set of initial values, as you will most likely end up generating a lot of combinations, then reducing the collection using Set…"

Aug 12, 2011

kiara replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"great! thanks Danny for the quick reply! I had increased the seed number but couldn't figure out how to delete the duplicate branches...was stuck with numbers and didn't think of manipulating the strings. Just…"

Aug 12, 2011

Danny Boyes replied to kiara's discussion Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

"With only 3 variables I don't think you are going to see the variance in such a finite amount of seeds. I would use this approach: Still using the Jitter component, but with overkill in generating the sequences. Then you can use (with a bit of…"

Aug 12, 2011

kiara posted a discussion

Jitter component without repetiton of branches?

Hi,I am trying to apply a permutation to a set of values and obtain, as output, all of the possible arrangements without any duplicate.As an exampleif I have the following set of 3 values:{A,B,C} n=3I want to obtain:{A,B,C}; {A,C,B}; {C,A,B}; {B,C,A}; {B,A,C}; {C,B,A} I know that the possible arrangements will be given by n! (see *)that means 3! = 3x2x1 = 6 I will have 6 possible arrangements. So, I tried using the Jitter component with 6 different seeds values but I obtain a set of values…See More

Aug 12, 2011

10 Comments

kiara posted a discussion

Surface Split - List order comparison

hi,when using the Surface Split comand the output list will all be shuffled compared to the inserted curves geometry. I know the "domain edge" isocurve will duplicate at least one value of the list (surface domain 0 to 1 and from 1 to 0) but why all the list order seems shuffled up (and not only increased just by 1 value)?I would like to use the sort list component but due to the geometry I am using there is no rule or value (as distance, point location or vector) that can be used to sort the…See More

Mar 29, 2011

0 Comments

kiara replied to kiara's discussion split surface - domain issue

"Hi Systemik, sorry for replying so late.. your file works perfectly...many thanks! k."

Mar 25, 2011

Systemiq replied to kiara's discussion split surface - domain issue

"Fixing the fix of the fix! It should work at least on my example."

Mar 23, 2011

kiara replied to kiara's discussion split surface - domain issue

"thanks, I had a look at the file... I understand the process... theoretically it should work but unfortunately the breps are still separated at the sphere domain edge.. let you know if i find a solution thanks! k."

Mar 23, 2011

Systemiq replied to kiara's discussion split surface - domain issue

"This should work better, really not an elegant solution though."

Mar 22, 2011