Mandelbrot

Comment

Comment by Tuğrul Yazar on October 12, 2012 at 2:32am

Installed 0.9.0014 and now it's working.

Comment by Daniel Piker on October 11, 2012 at 5:25am

Hi Tuğrul,

The file was made in GH 0.9.0014

but I think maybe the problem is caused by the version of Hoopsnake

what error do you get ?

Comment by Tuğrul Yazar on October 11, 2012 at 12:03am

I couldn't run mand3d on 0.9.0006.

Comment by Daniel Piker on October 10, 2012 at 3:32pm

Nice find Systemiq - power 4 does indeed seem to give some nice results!

Comment by Agneesh on October 10, 2012 at 1:39pm

Very nice and informative as expected from Tugrul.

Comment by Systemiq on October 10, 2012 at 1:16pm

Mand3d seems to converge better with power 4.

Power 4, step 5 :

Power 4, step ???,  different range:

Comment by Daniel Piker on October 10, 2012 at 7:41am

Nice article, thanks for sharing!

One thing I find interesting about the Mandelbrot set is that it is just one 2D slice of a 4D object.

(http://www.relativitybook.com/CoolStuff/julia_set.html)

I've seen a few different ways of taking flat 3D slices, but something I tried a while back using Grasshopper that I think is a bit different from what has been done before is evaluating the set on the surface of a hypersphere and stereographically projecting back to flat 3d space.

There seems to be some interesting form emerging, and I'd love to see it in more detail, but it gets pretty heavy to compute in this way when you increase the resolution...

Anyway, here's the definition - would be interested to see if anyone has any ideas about how it could be taken further.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26034251/mand3d.gh