point figures as coincident 'though it isn't (or i am missing something..)

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on April 19, 2015 at 6:13am

I get the correct value of zero (outside) when I open the file over here.

Could it be that your Rhino model tolerance settings are bigger than the distance from point 1037 to the curve?

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on April 19, 2015 at 6:15am

Point 585 however does give a value of 1 for me.

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on April 19, 2015 at 6:17am

In fact yes I can confirm that the component returns 1 if the point is within absolute tolerance.

Attachments:

• forumcoincidentpoint.gh, 36 KB

Permalink Reply by Andrei Raducanu on April 19, 2015 at 6:49am

Yep, this seems to be it, thanks! I actually thought of this before asking here, the thing is it seems to take a while for GH to acknowledge the tolerance change, that's why i missed it. It seems advisable to hit Recompute after tolerance change and it will update, otherwise you won't see the change for quite some time (like i did).

PS; uuuh, .0077 coming up...!
maybe you can make this possibly easy implementation: providing one of those hook icons to substitute the expression "-x"