generative modeling for Rhino
Hi,
I am a little disappointed that the planar surface component doesn´t work like the used icon is promising.
The icon shows a bunge of curves and lines which are overlapping at the end. Of course they need to be planar, but in GH it does not work with overlapping curves.
Is there a trick to activate this function? I hoped this component will work similiar to the "boolean" curve in Rhino which creates a closed curve based on a bunge of overlapping curves - no matter if open or closed.
any tips or workarounds are welcome....
thanks
Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on July 2, 2012 at 10:22am
Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on July 2, 2012 at 10:35am
Permalink Reply by Thomas J. Mrokon on July 3, 2012 at 1:16am Hi Michael,
the idea is nice, but it doesn´t work in my case.
Just take a look at the definition....
Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on July 4, 2012 at 9:40am
Permalink Reply by Thomas J. Mrokon on July 5, 2012 at 12:17am
Permalink Reply by Mariana Schetini Basso on February 27, 2013 at 1:17pm Michael an people hi!
Could you help me with a doubt?
I'm also trying to do surfaces from curves exactly as the first file, but in my second file I couldn't understand what is the error, cause the component made surfaces only in few curves. What can I do to solve this?
***need the Rabbit plugin to open the files***
Permalink Reply by Felipe Romero on February 28, 2013 at 2:31pm the problem was that the curves weren't planar
don't use region difference, best merge curves and use planar srf
Permalink Reply by Mariana Schetini Basso on March 1, 2013 at 1:53pm Felipe, actually when you unlinked the offset component at the "surface" group (which that you wrote "i didn't understand this offset"), the shape stopped to do the radial offset (and it was becoming the curves not planar i think!), but i need to offset this to transform the shape. Try to slide the red rectangular linked to Amplitude(A)to see what happens on radial shape4.gh file. Could you help me to solve this without unlink the offset?
Permalink Reply by Felipe Romero on March 1, 2013 at 8:19pm I see what you want to do; I'm afraid it is not possible, in this deffinition you can see that the resulting surface aren't planar; I work in a slightly different definition that works
Permalink Reply by Felipe Romero on March 1, 2013 at 10:49pm This definition works well, although you have to change according to the number of "levels"
Permalink Reply by Shridhar Mamidalaa on March 2, 2013 at 12:11am This is interesting but i don't see that second component in my grasshopper.
Permalink Reply by Felipe Romero on March 2, 2013 at 12:42pm What component?
© 2013 Created by Scott Davidson.
Powered by